Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Multi-processor solutions and performance |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:34:02 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi, I was going through the mailing list and there was a discussion about Multi-processor based solutions and specifically discussing about Bivio hardware. As I understand it has 6 processors with one network processor. Network processor directs the sessions to these application processors using some kind of hash calcuated with source IP and destination IP of the packet. Both NFR and Sourcefire confirmed that they have IPS solution on this hardware. Does anybody have performance numbers on these boxes? Specifically, I am interested in 64bytes, 320bytes and 1518 bytes packet UDP throughput performance numbers AND HTTP connection rate, throughput numbers. Are there any functionality limitations observed in these kinds of box solutions? Thanks Surya __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: IDS vs. IPS deployment feedback, Andrew Plato |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IDS vs. IPS deployment feedback, Will Metcalf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: System call based IDS for linux?, Olaf Gellert |
| Next by Thread: | Old issue- MS NT PPTP/RAS DoS, SanjayR |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |