Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: SNORT Testing |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 2 Mar 2006 04:07:58 -0600 |
I've been doing some benchmarking lately on snort packet loss and have found great success using netstrain to load the line. I'm not looking at attack detection right now as much as I am squeezing every last drip of performance out. What I do is start up 2 or 3 sets of netstrain, watch the system with "top", then I start snort without -D and let it run for a bit before I ctrl+c it. I check the dropped packets percentage and modify things trying to get it smaller and smaller. I keep an eye on top to make sure the system isn't loading abnormally. I also watch the speeds in netstrain for slow or spiked traffic. It's not an exact method but works for me and is a fun way to kill time. I imagine once I'm satisfied or I reach the limit I will more than likely load the network as before and start sending exploits, various scanning, etc... That's how I test snort without spending a dime. -Terry -----Original Message----- From: Byron Sonne [mailto:blsonne@rogers.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:56 PM To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: SNORT Testing
The tools that come to mind for me are 'stick' and 'snot': http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-09/0096.html
Folks... I never said they were good tools! As far as I'm concerned, the only test that matters is a real world one. Every network is different, sometimes radically, and I don't see much of a point trying to generalize these kinds of things with a test suite. Artificial tests give you artificial results. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SNORT Testing, Eric Hines |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IDS Analyst skill set, Eric Grejda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SNORT Testing, Byron Sonne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SNORT Testing, Stefano Zanero |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |