Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-IDS
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Testing IDS/IPS Solutions

Subject: Re: Testing IDS/IPS Solutions
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:00:43 -0500
I am a concerned about the simplistic approach of only testing the
accuracy of this devices. Many other parameters should be measured,
including the amount of bandwidth the device can handle, the time from
attack detection to reporting, etc. Not to mention how the alerts are
reported, etc

Now, if you want to only test the accuracy, then you should probably
generate "normal" traffic and see if there are false positives, and
then mix that traffic with attack traffic, collected from a honeypot,
for example. You should also try typical evasion tools, like
libwhisker, to check how the devices handle fragmentation and others
evasion techniques. Or of course, use some commercial product, ias
other posted suggested, if it has a good set of tests.

Some good literature on that

http://perso.rd.francetelecom.fr/debar/papers/DebMor02.pdf by Herve Debar et all

http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistir/nistir-7007.pdf

http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~owen/Research/Conference%20Publications/Athanasiades_IIAW2003.pdf

Best,

Jesus




On 1/11/06, Aaron Turner <synfinatic@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/7/06, Andres Riancho <andres.riancho@gmail.com> wrote:
You could use tcpsic for testing how well the appliance handles
fragmented packets, you could use nikto and nessus to see how many
attacks each one detects a

Why would you use a vulnerability scanner to see how an UTM detects an
attack?  Vuln scanners nowadays go to great lengths NOT to actually
exploit a vulnerability because people get pissed when their servers
crash.

If you want to see how well an UTM detects someone running nessus
against your network, then by all means use nessus.  But if you want
to see how well it detects an actual attack, then you had better use
traffic which actually looks like an actual exploit.

With that said, the original poster should go look in the list
archives and google.  Someone asks how to test an
IDS/IPS/Firewall/UTM/etc on this list every virtually every week and
it's pretty boring reading the same answers/vendors reminding us that
nothing significant has changed in the last year or so.


--
Aaron Turner
http://synfin.net/

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it 
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>