Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: location of an IPS |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:22:51 +0100 (BST) |
Worst case scenario, you have 5,000 SYN Packets (equates to approx 3Mbs), all trying to establish a conection. Each of these will create a flow/connection table entry on the Unity 50, so 5,000 packets equates to 5,000 (half) connections per second. So I would always design a perimeter solution with this in mind. Remember, I'm talking worst case scenario, and not what would be in a typical stream - 5,000 connections can easily run into a gig. But it's not normal traffic we want to deal with using an IPS - it's the abnormal stuff - bad content and unacceptable rates. Start with the worst possible thing that could happen, and you've got yourself a decent security solution. Under engineer, and you've only got yourself to blame when it all goes tits up. :) Matt --- Kurt Seifried <bt@seifried.org> wrote:
Uhh your math is wrong. You're assuming each packet is a new connection/etc. I can saturate my backend 100 megabit network with 1 connection (rsync backups). 5,000 connections per second is a reasonable amount of traffic (5,000 simaltaneous emails, www sessions, DNS queries, etc, it's certainly possible, and chances are it will consume a significant amount of bandwidth). -Kurt SeifriedAn IPS should be placed in front of the firewall,toprovide complete network protection. However, the Unity 50 is quite low spec - 5,000 connections per second, 5,000 concurrentconnections.Bearing in mind most Check Point firewalls have a default connection table size of 40,000 (?) connections, then putting the Unity 50 in front of your firewall would be a bottleneck. Assuming small packet size (512bits per packet),then5,000 of these per second equates to just under3Mbs.If your Internet feed is less than this, then no problem. If it's higher, then the Unity 50 wouldnotbe able to handle a 3Mbs pipe full of smallpackets.You should really design your perimeter with this worse case scenario in mind, especially if youhavenegotiated burst rates with your ISP and your ISPfeedcan suddenly shoot up in usage. Port scans should be blocked by the firewall - all irrelevant ports are discarded at this point. I'mnotsure how the Unity 50 handles port scans, Ihaven'tplayed with one yet... ;) Regards, Matt --- Doug Fox <dfox168@hotmail.com> wrote:I'm sorry for this dumb question, which may have been answered many times. Where should one place an TippingPoint Unity 50IPSdevice? Behind or in front of a firewall? I have a/the TippingPoint behind a Check Point firewall. Even though we externally and internally port-scanned thefirewalland the IPS many times, the activity log did not contain any record ofthe"attacks". What am I missing here? Any pointers are appreciated. Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we'vedeveloped the all newYahoo! Security Centre.http://uk.security.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: location of an IPS, Kurt Seifried |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: location of an IPS, asalo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: location of an IPS, Kurt Seifried |
| Next by Thread: | Re: location of an IPS, Paul Schmehl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |