Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Snort and Nessus Signature |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:54:11 -0400 |
-----Original Message----- From: cruxiezzzzz@yahoo.com [mailto:cruxiezzzzz@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:53 AM To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Snort and Nessus Signature Hi All, I am doing some research into integrating Snort and Nessus together. Just wondering if there are any Snort or Nessus Experts out there that can tell me if there are using the same tables for their signatures? cause i understand that they both use the CVE and BID tracking. Not to sure bout the way their signatures are stored though. would be great if anyone out there can shed some light on this. thanks alot Crux
Snort sigs are all stored in text files and there's plenty of documentation on them. Many have BIDs and CVE numbers and some even have Nessus plugin IDs. However, there are some that have only Snort signature IDs or are generated by preprocessors. Those signatures are usually just generically bad packets. My suggestion (and I'm not a CISSP or anything, so it's just what I think, and if you already thought of this good for you): Find a way to store Snort rules and Nessus signatures in a database and use some program to generate your own flat-file Snort ruleset. Leave all Snort rules that don't have any of those IDs in the ruleset. Run Nessus and then whatever matches you get you can now correlate with Snort signatures. Add those to your ruleset and you'll have a fairly optimized set. I've occasionally considered doing something like this but have always lacked the time. I wouldn't do this if I were going to use Snort-Inline as an IPS, though. Since I[D|P]Ses are an "enumerating badness" game I'd want to block as much bad traffic as I could get away with. With an IDS, I want to know about recon activity and exploits that can actually hurt me. Derick Anderson ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Snort and Nessus Signature, barcajax |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Tippingpoint, dave . anon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Snort and Nessus Signature, barcajax |
| Next by Thread: | Tippingpoint, dave . anon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |