Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Auto-sensing for IPS devices |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:14:15 -0700 |
Auto-Negotiation is essential in larger networks. When you are talking about 1000's of switch ports and PC's connecting/disconnecting constantly (think public campus) how could you ever enforce a rule like "OK, Set your NIC to 100/Full before you connect". However for servers I believe it is a best practice to manually set the ports at whatever they need to be. Sap On 9/15/05, McKinley, Jackson <Jackson.McKinley@team.telstra.com> wrote:
I agree with Lachlan. Auto neg is the best bet in larger networks I find from personal experience. I cant count the number of times ive seen Foundry and cisco miss-match when attempting to auto neg. Working from past exp when a customer plugs into your network with a "no brand" switch / device (Think colo datacentre's) the first thing I always looked for was stupid MTU settings and duplex miss-match. Altho in a nice all cisco or all foundry or all whateverotherbrandyoulike enviroment im sure auto neg would work much better. Ive just never had the pleasure of working in a centre like that ;) hahaha Cheers, Jack. -----Original Message----- From: Joel M Snyder [mailto:Joel.Snyder@Opus1.COM] Sent: Thursday, 15 September 2005 4:36 PM To: Lachlan Bowes Cc: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Auto-sensing for IPS devices I disagree that it is *always* a good idea. I think that it's *occasionally* a good idea. Either the standard for auto-sensing works or it doesn't. If you have defective hardware that doesn't work right, then it's better to know about it than to patch around the problem---are you going to set every single port on a flakey switch? Or should you get rid of the switch? However, if you decide that it *is* a good idea, just a reminder that you MUST set BOTH speed and duplex settings and you MUST set BOTH settings on BOTH sides. There is no concept in 802.3 of having only one side autonegotiate and 'learn' what the other side wants. If you take one side out of auto-negotiate mode and hard code a speed/duplex setting, the other side has no way of figuring out what you did. I have seen people who think that they're making things more reliable actually break their networks by only setting one side of the connection and assuming that the other will follow along magically. jms -- Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719 Phone: +1 520 324 0494 (voice) +1 520 324 0495 (FAX) jms@Opus1.COM http://www.opus1.com/jms Opus One ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Auto-sensing for IPS devices, McKinley, Jackson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Snort and Nessus Signature, barcajax |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Auto-sensing for IPS devices, McKinley, Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Auto-sensing for IPS devices, djmeier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |