Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-IDS
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: IPS comparison

Subject: RE: IPS comparison
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:15:52 -0400
- I agree that "anomaly detection" != "zero day" detection. Just
because
  my DNS server starts to connect to all the other hosts on my
network,
  doesn't mean it has got a worm on it. 

It might if your DNS server doesn't normally do this.  Consider a
network anomaly detection system that profiled your network and created
unique usage/behavioral profiles for each host (including Ron's DNS
server).  You've told the box how your internal address space is defined
so now the box also knows your network's "dark" or unused address space.

(Defined internal address space) - (active hosts seen) = Unused or
"Dark" IP space

Now consider that your DNS server gets infected with a new worm and
starts scanning nearby hosts.  A smart NADS (network anomaly detection
system) will be able to quickly determine that this host is scanning
your dark address space (honeynet concept).  Any activity being directed
at this unused space can be assumed to be suspect.  

Also, consider the port being used.  If this is not a port that the DNS
server normally uses, then that would be suspect as well.  Not to
mention all of the tcp resets or icmp port unreachables (in the case of
UDP) that the DNS server will receive as it scans across your network.

Check out the whitepapers published by NADS vendors that outline cases
where new "zero-day" worms were detected before signatures became
available.  I agree that marketing departments squeeze all they can out
of zero-day, but I can at least vouch that our SteatlhWatch products
detected Zotob (and its variants) without the need for any signature
updates.  This means customers had early detection before signatures
were available.  I'm sure there are some other vendors out there that
can report the same.  Even signature based solutions can tout this if
they write sigs for the vulnerability as opposed to the exploit.

Joe


Joe Hamm, CISSP
Senior Security Engineer
Lancope, Inc.
jhamm@lancope.com
404.644.7227  (cell)
770.225.6509   (fax)

Lancope - Security through Network Intelligence(tm)
StealthWatch(tm) by Lancope, a next-generation network security
solution, delivers behavior-based intrusion detection, policy
enforcement and insightful network analysis.  Visit www.lancope.com.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Gula [mailto:rgula@tenablesecurity.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:56 PM
To: Focus-Ids Mailing List
Subject: Re: IPS comparison

At 06:01 PM 8/29/2005, Stefano Zanero wrote:
Daniel Cid wrote:
This "anomaly" detection will only detect 0-day exploits for known 
vulnerabilities.

A zero-day exploit is a curious marketing thing. You suddenly redefine 
a difficult problem (catching zero-days) as a rather simpler problem 
(create signatures that actually describe the vulnerability, which is 
what any signature worth your licensing cost should do).

So, presto!, you can rush up and put out some rather nice marketing 
material on it.

Fact is, anomaly detection is so rare that it's almost unexistant in 
the commercial products, except for limited forms of "protocol anomaly 
detection" and for Arbor's peakflow technology.

Two comments here.

- lot's of NIDS that tend to code for a vulnerability, don't actually
   code for the vulnerability. They are still writing attack signatures.
   The attack signatures are smarter than what was standard about five
   years ago, but I've yet to really see a NIDS come out of the box
   with full vuln/IDS correlation.

- I agree that "anomaly detection" != "zero day" detection. Just because
   my DNS server starts to connect to all the other hosts on my network,
   doesn't mean it has got a worm on it.

Ron Gula, CTO
Tenable Network Security


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it 
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>