Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: IPS technology question. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:56:16 -0400 |
On Tue, THolman@toplayer.com said a little something like:
A standard PCI bus (PCI-X, 133Mhz) is only capable of 1.06Gbps. This means 530Mbs in, and 530Mbs out, not taking into account things like hard-disks, logging/reporting and any packet inspection, which only serve to pull this number down further. It is architecturally impossible for a standard Intel platform to attain a throughput of anything higher than 530Mbs, let alone the 2Gpbs you claim below? A further explanation of these figures may help clear things up? Regards, Tim
Nope. Let's look at the math... 133Mhz * 64bit = 8Gbit/sec. That's assuming 100% efficiency... PCI-X is ~70% or so... so we get: ~6Gbit/sec. Assuming we have traffic to flow in both directions: 3Gbit/sec full duplex. AND that's PCI-X 1.0... PCI-X 2.0 specifies two faster clock speeds: 266MHz (16Gbit/sec 100% efficiency) and 533MHz (32Gbit/sec, 100%). The only way your statement is true is if the devices are running 33Mhz on a 32bit bus. I doubt any serious vendor is running 32bit/33Mhz devices. Now, if you have any slow device, the bus will take the clock speed of the slowest device along the path to the cpu... Usually big systems will have a separate bus for each slot (or will group them), so taking the slowest device on a bus is not a killer. Simple multiplication. --Jason L. Wright NFR Security, Inc. jason@nfr.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: IPS comparison, Joseph Hamm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: IPS technology question., Palmer, Paul (ISSAtlanta) |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: IPS technology question., Swift, David |
| Next by Thread: | RE: IPS technology question., Palmer, Paul (ISSAtlanta) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |