Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: IDS evaluations procedures |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:49:22 -0400 |
If by "real" you mean standard Internet noise (port scans etc) then I would say very approximately 6 events per minute, based on what I see on our many Internet firewalls. This is of course a function of the size of the IP subnet on that link. E.g. a class C gets a lot less malicious packets than a class B because it has 1/255th of the IPs. Also if the subnet contains say amazon.com it is going to be much more attractive and therefore you will see many more probes. Without knowing how much legitimate bandwidth you are sending I couldn't say what the ratio is. But for a typical website with 10Mb/s of legitimate traffic it is a fraction of a % I guess you need to think about the maximum performance of your solution and therefore you should err on the side of caution and go for a heavy amount of attack traffic e.g. 5% or more. -----Original Message----- From: Joel Esler [mailto:eslerj@gmail.com] Sent: 12 July 2005 15:48 To: david.sames@sparta.com Cc: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: IDS evaluations procedures depends on the bandwidth of the network. On 12 Jul 2005 02:40:18 -0000, david.sames@sparta.com <david.sames@sparta.com> wrote:
I'm in the process of developing test procedures for evaluating an
internal anomaly-based detection system. I'd like to construct a test set of nominal data peppered with attack data. What is a reasonable ratio of attack data to "normal" traffic that is representative of "real" systems.
Thanks, Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --
Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | RE: IDS and Bandwidth, THolman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: IDS and Bandwidth, Nathan Davidson |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: IDS evaluations procedures, Omar Herrera |
| Next by Thread: | RE: IDS evaluations procedures, Sames, David |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |