Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: IDS evaluations procedures |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2005 03:33:48 -0400 |
Hi Dave, Take a peek at the Internet Storm Centre @ SANS - http://isc.sans.org/ Gives you a good idea about what's going on. Which IDS devices are you looking at? All IDS devices are subject to large numbers of false positives, which is why if you're making a new investment you should consider IPS technology, as this gives you a far lower TCO and real-world protection against zero-day threats. It also saves you having to buy lots of IDS sensors, seeming a large proportion of the load will be absorbed and taken care of by the IPS. Just my 2 cents.. ;) Cheers, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Sames, David [mailto:David.Sames@sparta.com] Sent: 13 July 2005 04:54 To: THolman@toplayer.com Subject: RE: IDS evaluations procedures Thanks for the info - those are exactly the kinds of characteristics I need to consider - at this point, I'm not evaluating a product per se - I'm evaluating some claims by some of our researchers :-) FP's are what I'm most concerned about. I'll check things out to see if I can get more stats - and of attempt to produce some data sets that may look like "anomalies" but are really traffic spikes and shouldn't be flagged.
To specifically answer your question, look at current attack weather reports - you'll see approximately 15-20% of perimeter traffic is in fact worms trying to propagate. Any evaluation should be designed with this in mind. ..but more importantly, make sure you're evaluating something that will do the job in hand and doesn't lead you up the garden path with inaccurate marketing collateral! :) <<< That's exactly what I was looking for ! Regards, Dave -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: IDS evaluations procedures, THolman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: IDS and Bandwidth, THolman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: IDS evaluations procedures, THolman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IDS evaluations procedures, Adam Powers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |