Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Vulnerability & Exploit Signatures |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:35:29 -0400 |
Do all these vendors license the same set of "base" filters from, say, Sourcefire / Snort derived rule source in the back?
Not exactly (especially in the past... before Sourcefire pulled the "bait and switch" trick; just to be clear, I'm not saying they are bad for doing it... it's business and they are trying to make money... there's nothing wrong with that). There's a small number of companies (besides Sourcefire) that put Snort on an appliance. In these cases it is true that they use snort rules, but, I guess, it doesn't make sense to do otherwise :-) There's a number of IDS and IPS solutions that are capable of converting snort rules into their native format. I will not name any commercial companies, but I'd like to mention Bro IDS as an open source example ( www.bro-ids.org ), which is being developed by Vern Paxson (who's name should be familiar to anybody who's serious about networking) and a number of contributors. In Bro, there's a script that takes snort signatures into Bro signatures. Let's not forget security hardware acceleration vendors. It's very popular for them to use snort to demonstrate their hardware acceleration technology, but it's upto OEMs that those cards to use Snort or to put their own IDS or IPS technology on top. Just like Dodge said, most IDS and IPS vendors do use Snort as a resource. It would be crazy to do otherwise; however, they use it only as a reference (for a number of reasons). One of those reasons is that the architecture is very different and it's impossible to directly map snort signatures to what they have. Another good reason IDS/IPS vendors wouldn't want to use snort signatures "as is" is because snort is far from perfect when it comes to its detection capabilities. Snort has a lot of limitations that an IDS/IPS vendor wouldn't want to inherit (I am not putting down snort here. I think it's a great IDS that can do a lot. I'm simply pointing out that it still has a lot to improve). And if we talk about top IDS/IPS vendors, they usually develop their signatures or code updates before snort has something. When snort signatures or preprocessors come out, they simply use it as a validation mechanism or as a marketing research to identify snort signature's weaknesses. Kyle -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NIPS/NIDS performance evaluation query, ADT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Vulnerability & Exploit Signatures, Marc Maiffret |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Vulnerability & Exploit Signatures, M. Dodge Mumford |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Vulnerability & Exploit Signatures, Marc Maiffret |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |