-----Original Message-----
From: Kohlenberg, Toby [mailto:toby.kohlenberg@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 10:42 AM
To: Hazel, Scott A.; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: on NIDS/NIPS tuning
I'd suggest that IDS(ips) tuning is still essential. Not only do
rules/sigs
need to be tuned but new sigs/rules need to be added to fit your
environment.
Where to tune is a very good question and not easily answered. I
generally
try to tune on the sensor first and on the SIM second. The idea being
that I
want to decrease the work the sensor has to do rather than just ignore
it.
That said, it's only reasonable to do that if you can be confident of
reducing
false positives without increasing false negatives at the same time.
toby
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hazel, Scott A. [mailto:Scott.Hazel@unisys.com]
>Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 9:20 PM
>To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
>Subject: RE: on NIDS/NIPS tuning
>
>This is a fundamental question we've been dealing with as well. By
>default we tune the IDS. But when the SIM tool is thrown into the mix,
>the question becomes where to tune. Theoretically, the SIM uses all the
>data it sees to correlate attacks, attackers, trends in suspicious
>activity, etc. If you tune what appears to be noise at the IDS, you
>could potentially be tuning out data the SIM uses to correlate
>and alert
>on a higher quality event.
>
>Conversely, tuning out known FP's at the IDS should create a higher
>quality data stream for the SIM to use. Logic points me to opening the
>IDS and letting the SIM do the work. The SIM would also be where the
>data was tuned. In the end, it seems you could go either way depending
>on how you want your alerts served up to you and how much disk you've
>got to hold all that data in the IDS.
>
>Thanks for starting this thread though. Tuning an IDS seems as much an
>art as a science. I'm glad to see input on how the rest of you handle
>it.
>
>Scott Hazel
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gary Halleen [mailto:ghalleen@cisco.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:17 PM
>To: 'Drew Simonis'; 'Anton A. Chuvakin'; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
>Subject: RE: on NIDS/NIPS tuning
>
>I'm seeing many organizations now tuning not on the IDS, but on the SIM
>product they're using for monitoring them.
>
>Gary
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Drew Simonis [mailto:simonis@myself.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:02 AM
>To: Anton A. Chuvakin; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
>Subject: Re: on NIDS/NIPS tuning
>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I was thinking about some issues with IDS alerts (their volume, etc)
>> and realized I could use some help from the list. It might
>also be a
>> fun discussion item.
>>
>> So, here it is: how many folks who buy/download a NIDS/NIPS actually
>> tune it? Long time ago when I was asking this question the previous
>> time, I was scared to learn that lots of people do not tune their
>> NIDSs. Is it any better now?
>>
>
>I know that, in my experience, many orgs don't tune at all.
>The fear is
>that they might do it wrong and thereby miss some important
>event. IMO,
>this is a stupid way of thinking, but I bet it isn't as rare as it
>should
>be.
>
>In other cases, people do not tune and rely on a correlation engine or
>MSS
>to filter the events. This is better, but really just moves the tuning
>to a
>different level.
>
>Personally, I tune sigs and also tailor the sig sets to the devices
>being
>monitored. For example, if there are no webservers on a segment, I
>might
>not be as inclined to use sigs that check for Apache exploits. I've
>never
>really measured the impact on the system vs. the administrative cost of
>doing this, however, so it is quite possible I am wasting time for a
>negligable benefit.
>
>On the tuning side, I believe that filters and exclusions
>should be part
>of
>the incident response lifecycle. If I am alerted to an event
>by an IDS,
>I
>investigate and discover that the event was benign or did not take
>place, a
>filter should result, and thus be properly documented.
>
>-Ds
>
>--
>___________________________________________________________
>Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
>http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>--
>Test Your IDS
>
>Is your IDS deployed correctly?
>Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
>CORE IMPACT.
>Go to
>http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
>
>to learn more.
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>--
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>--
>Test Your IDS
>
>Is your IDS deployed correctly?
>Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
>CORE IMPACT.
>Go to
>http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
>
>to learn more.
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>--
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>Test Your IDS
>
>Is your IDS deployed correctly?
>Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
>CORE IMPACT.
>Go to
>http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
>to learn more.
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
