Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS?? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 18 May 2005 16:05:31 -0400 |
This is a bit of marketspeak, but, in general, an exploit signature would look at the strings in a particular exploit while vulnerability would try to match any pattern that would trigger the vulnerability, not just a particular exploit. For example, program X has a buffer overflow if a certain field is greater than 255 characters. An exploit is written for this vulnerability which has the pattern "AAAAAAAAAA...AAAShEllCodeZZZZ" (256 characters) followed by the shell code strings. An exploit signature would look for the particular pattern in this exploit (string of "A"s followed by the word "ShEllCode" followed by the NOP sled followed by some shell code. A vulnerability signature would look for any string longer than 255 characters and directed to this particular field in this application. This is harder to write to avoid false positives, but would catch new exploits, not just the exploit identified by the first signature. -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Winston [mailto:jctx09@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:58 PM To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS?? Can someone explain to me the difference in writing signatures based on Vulnerabilities versus writing signatures based on Exploits? TippingPoint makes a claim that their IPS is better because they write signatures based on Vulnerabilities and not exploits. I don't quite understand this. Thank you, -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS??, Jordan Wiens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Packet/Protocol Anomaly Detection with IDS, Frlinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS??, Jordan Wiens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS??, David W. Goodrum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |