Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-IDS
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS??

Subject: Re: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS??
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:54 -0700
Jacob,

Vulnerabilities are the flaw, while an exploit is what takes advantage of the vulnerability.

For example, Blaster. The vulnerability was in Microsoft's DCE RPC code, while "Blaster" was the name of the exploit that took advantage of the flaw in the code. When Blaster first hit the net, signature writers were scrambling to develop a signature that would detect it, but kept producing signatures for the exploit, which kept changing, and therefore new signatures were coming out (some as high as 16 different signatures).

TippingPoint is correct in their assertion that writing signatures for the vulnerability is better. Signatures based on exploits run into problems, simply because exploits have variances and can morph, which makes signatures based on the exploit ineffective. However, signatures based on the vulerability typically doesn't change.

Ed Gibbs
IPS Security Technologist
ed@digitalconclave.com





Exploit
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacob Winston" <jctx09@yahoo.com>
To: <focus-ids@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:57 PM
Subject: Vulnerability vs. Exploit signatures and IPS??






Can someone explain to me the difference in writing signatures based on Vulnerabilities versus writing signatures based on Exploits? TippingPoint makes a claim that their IPS is better because they write signatures based on Vulnerabilities and not exploits. I don't quite understand this.

Thank you,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>