Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:03:00 -0500 |
I would also like to add this simple question (and answer) to the mix.
What is the best way to evade an IDS?
Knowing what it looks for...
Open sigs for an IDS/IPS does more harm then good (for the majority) IMO.
IE a SKILLED attacker wants to attack my network, and i use an ids
that has an open sig set. Via posts on various mailing lists the
attacker has worked up a probability matrix of what products are being
used for IDS/IPS. So happens that those products have an open
signature set. Now all the attacker has to do is look at what those
systems deficiencies are (be it from a technical stand point, be it
from a sig stand point) and modify his attack to circumvent the
product that is put in place.
Those opens sigs sure did help in evading the protection put in place.
The best option IMO is having a skilled R&D team who is on the edge of
what is out there, a closed signature set, and the ABILITY to add your
own SIGNATURES from other sources (be it snort based rules only or
snort based rules + vendor based rule framework). All of a sudden
you then have the best of both worlds.
Oh and simple pattern matching is crap, there needs to be an
abstraction layer above the pattern matching that says "apply this
pattern if the following criteria have been meet {syn syn ack syn ack
*pattern* rst}" or something along those lines that are exploit
specific, be it flow information or protocol level flags or features.
Andre
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:06:02 -0800, Andrew Plato
<andrew.plato@anitian.com> wrote:
1. I know ISS's language to some extent because I helped develop the engine inside their product (I worked at Network ICE before ISS bought them.) Some are simple pattern matches, many are not. 2. I am familiar with Snort's rules (although I do not profess to be an expert). I also know that Snort's rules, while very powerful and flexible, are WELL beyond the capability of 90% of the IT and network admins in the world. Most organizations don't take the time (nor do they have the time) to analyze signatures. They are more consumed with things like productivity and performance. I know this from my experience (10+ years) as an IT consultant. Thus my point - while seeing the details of a signature is fascinating to security geeks, it is not terribly important to the vast majority of IT admins. As such, I don't think the ability to see signature specs is an important measure of the value of an IPS/IDS product. It may be important to security nerds, but the general IT/network admin population doesn't care that much. And frankly, products that do show their signature details are rarely changed anyways. ___________________________________ Andrew Plato, CISSP President/Principal Consultant ANITIAN ENTERPRISE SECURITY 3800 SW Cedar Hills Blvd, Suite 280 Beaverton, OR 97005 503-644-5656 Office 503-214-8069 Fax 503-201-0821 Mobile www.anitian.com ___________________________________ GPG fingerprint: 16E6 C5B0 B6CB F287 776E E9A9 AF47 9914 3582 633D GPG public key available at: http://www.anitian.com/corp/keys.htm -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Berry [mailto:jberry@PENSON.COM] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:50 AM To: Andrew Plato; Stephane; rick.brady@libertymutual.com Cc: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider Since you can't see the signature, how do you know they aren't doing simple string matching? Second, obviously you aren't very familiar with Snort's rule language, it isn't just simple string matching, there is a *ton* of other logic available to reduce false positives/negatives. Snort also has conveniently had support for PCRE matching for a long time now. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Nigel Lewis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Sergey V Soldatov |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Andrew Plato |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Prashant Khandelwal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |