Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:59:41 -0500 (GMT-05:00) |
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Roesch <roesch@sourcefire.com> Sent: Mar 15, 2005 10:00 AM To: "David W. Goodrum" <dgoodrum@nfr.com> Cc: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider A few comments: 1) Open "signatures" are about trust, if people have no idea why or how and IDS is doing what it's doing then when the false positives inevitably pop up the user has absolutely no clue what has happened. I find that to be one of the most annoying things about using other people's IDS technologies, their opaqueness drives a constant nagging doubt that the system is configured and working properly. IMO that's one of the reasons that Snort is as popular as it is, people know how and why it does what it does (for better or worse) and the transparency allows them a certain level of comfort that they're in control of and can trust the system instead of the other way around.
I tend to disagree on this, since there are more than ways to detect an exploit or how to discuss how and why things work when they do. The transparency issue is mute if the product is well constructed and doesn't shake apart when folded, binded or crumpled. There is a certain level of comfort that if something doesn't work right, one can work it on themselves, but if can compare this if I pay $xxx,xxx for fancy and very fast car. If it breaks under normal operating circumstances, Otto the mechanic better fix it for free. Same issue can be applied to the openness, if it breaks, it might not always get fixed right away since Otto isn't specifically assigned to it, or other wanna be Otto's attempt to know how to fix it. With the commercial application, the fix may not be readily available or until the number of days it is supposed to be released by the VRT :)
2) If a "signature" is written properly then evading it will be non-trivial. This all falls into the "writing the signature for the vulnerability instead of the exploit" thing that we argue about around here from time to time. I don't think knowing what someone is looking for does a whole lot if there's no way to avoid tripping it in the course of an exploit.
Hopefully some of the more out-dated signatures have been phased out or replaced with something stronger, faster, etc.
3) Snort has had 2 remote exploits (buffer overflow and integer overflow leading to heap overflow on certain platforms) and a 2-3 DoSes due to protocol handler mistakes in 6.5 years. ISS has had at least that many over the years and a resultant worm to boot. Did being closed really help them all that much? I think that developing in the open forces us to be a little more careful than we might otherwise be, but I think that over time being open leads to a more secure codebase due to the exposure to the "elements" that it entails.
I am defending ISS or other commercial entities that keep tight lids on their secret sauce or formula for Original versus New or fingering point on why things were done a certain way, just look at Sendmail or syslog, and the other freely available tools that have been in the Unix CVS for a while now. The community just knows who to single out if something really bad or coded improperly.
I wish I have $0.02.. :)
Anyway, just my $0.02, hope it was interesting.
-Marty
On Mar 12, 2005, at 8:54 AM, David W. Goodrum wrote:
I think it's interesting how this is an unwinnable argument for any vendor. At NFR our signatures are openly readable by our customers, but we've heard the exact opposite argument of what you are presenting here: "A potential hacker can read how the signatures work, and use that information to try to evade the IDS". So, if we appeased them, we'd close our signature base, and then we'd be hearing it from the other side of the house. This is a no-win situation for the vendor. We've tried to appease both sides by not having our sigs "publicly" available, but all a really determined hacker has to do is buy our product to read the signatures. So, before you ask ISS to release their codebase for their signature set, you might want to think about what the full consequences of that would be. Snort has had 2 or 3 remote exploits. The only reason this was possible is because their entire product is totally open to the world. I doubt ISS wants to open themselves up to that type of publicity. :) -dave Jeff Boggie wrote:No, the lack of visibility into ISS signature content is a major bone of contention in my shop. -----Original Message----- From: Brady, Rick [mailto:Rick.Brady@LibertyMutual.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 5:08 PM To: Melih Kirkgöz (Koç.net); Stephane; focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider Melih, I guess you must be special to ISS, from my experience the support has been sub-par. Also do you like the idea that ISS IDS signatures are not known to the customer and only ISS ? Rick Brady Liberty Mutual Group I/S TSSS Engineering Network Access Control mailto:rick.brady@libertymutual.com (603) 245-4214 8-435-4214sdn -----Original Message----- From: Melih Kirkgöz (Koç.net) [mailto:melihk@koc.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 2:22 AM To: Stephane; focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider Importance: High Hello Stephane, We have been using ISS since last two years.(50 Server Sensor,15 Network Sensor,1 Proventia G 100 IPS),managed by SiteProtector. We tested Netscreen,ISS,Radware,NAI Intrushield and Checkpoint during our evaluation period for intrusion detection/prevention systems. Strong level of expertise and good technical support was one of the big reasons choosing ISS. -----Original Message----- From: Stephane [mailto:stephane.d@ecologie.net] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 12:42 PM To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider Dear All, How do I choose an IDS/IPS provider if I need a strong level of expertise 24x7x365 and a worldwide representaion? I need it on Netscreen, PIX, CheckPoint and ISS Realsecure and Proventia. Thank you, S. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ______________________________________________________________________ ______ _________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. ______________________________________________________________________ ______ _________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ David W. Goodrum Senior Systems Engineer NFR Security 703.731.3765 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
-- Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO, Sourcefire Inc. - +1-410-290-1616 Sourcefire - Discover. Determine. Defend. - http://www.sourcefire.com Snort: Open Source Intrusion Detection and Prevention - http://www.snort.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Dave Aitel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, David W. Goodrum |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Melih Kırkgöz (Koç.net) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider, Martin Roesch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |