Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Current state of Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:45:49 -0500 |
On the contrary, I think that these large scale views would be perfect for identifying a storm like slammer. If that is what you team is looking for. How often do those come around? I think the industry has changed, or at least started to, and began to look a little closer to home. Perimeter defense is not as effective as a layered approach because of the realities of business interconnects today. Patch management, host based IDS and other technologies have really begun to fill, or muscle in to, those gaps. What I am saying is simply that when the service is offered by a large ISP, it is much less valuable than it's made out to be. Yes, slammer deserves a spot on the great map of internet disruptions. However, I need something that is a little closer to my assets. I.E. Something that can identify and/or verify lost integrity, stolen PII, or a confidentiality breach. In our ball court, everything else boils down to an SLA or noise. Sorry, I'm getting off topic again... jg -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Ptacek [mailto:tqbf@arbor.net] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:09 PM To: Gunnoe, Jason Cc: focus-ids@lists.securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Current state of Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection On Mar 1, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Gunnoe, Jason wrote:
I have seen large ISP's implement anomaly technologies on internet backbones, but typically, they are only useful for identifying large scale malware disruptions before they happen. They always give the slammer example, which is what, 4 years old now...
The Slammer example is usually given because it was one of the hardest attacks in the last 2 years to defend against, and one of the most damaging. I'm not sure whether you're trying to imply that these detection capabilities "weren't up to the task" of detecting Sasser. If that's your point, why don't you take a minute to justify it? --- Thomas H. Ptacek // Arbor Networks (734) 327-0000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Current state of Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection, Thomas Ptacek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Building an IDS security policy, Jeff With |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Current state of Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection, Thomas Ptacek |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Current state of Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection, Orit Vidas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |