I don't see it as being fussy, I see it as being a clear and
serious gap in the awareness of the history of intrusion detection.
Whenever I talk to vendors or researchers (on any topic) I expect
them to know at least as much about their product space as I do
(I'm a generalist, if I know it, a specialist damn well better).
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm sick of seeing ideas that
have been around for 20 years touted as "ground breaking!" or
"revolutionary!".
t
-----Original Message-----
From: (infor) urko zurutuza [mailto:uzurutuza@eps.mondragon.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Stefano Zanero; Kohlenberg, Toby
Cc: Ofer Shezaf; focus-ids@lists.securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Specification-based Anomaly Detection
Don't be so fussy! I agree with Stefano, the big IDS
trademarks as Cisco, ISS, NFR, Intrusion or Dragon have just
started offering a little bit of real anomaly detection (using
AI instead of signatures!), even if we know that network
anomaly detection is almost 15 years old in the research
comunity (I think the first was NADIR (Network Anomaly
Detector and Intrusion Reporter, of Los Alamos National
Laboratory in 1990).
__________________________________________________
MONDRAGON UNIBERTSITATEA
Urko Zurutuza
Dpto. Informática
Loramendi 4 - Aptdo.23
20500 Arrasate-Modragon
Tel. +34 943 739636 // +34 943 794700 Ext.297
www.eps.mondragon.edu
uzurutuza@eps.mondragon.edu
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Stefano Zanero [mailto:zanero@elet.polimi.it]
Enviado el: jueves, 13 de enero de 2005 21:14
Para: Kohlenberg, Toby
CC: Ofer Shezaf; focus-ids@lists.securityfocus.com
Asunto: Re: Specification-based Anomaly Detection
Kohlenberg, Toby wrote:
- and that anomaly detection (in particular techniques
which are not
rate-based) is a relative "newcomer" in the COMMERCIAL field of
intrusion detection, where most of the products are built
on a misuse
detection approach.
Really? What would you call CMDS? Which was a commercial
system that
used anomaly detection by building user profiles and was available
from ODS in the mid-90s?
My omission here: I meant NETWORK intrusion detection, as we
were talking about NIDS in those posts. Commercial anomaly
detection systems exist.
--
Cordiali saluti,
Stefano Zanero
Dottorando di Ricerca / Ph.D. Student
Politecnico di Milano - Dip. Elettronica e Informazione Via
Ponzio, 34/5 I-20133 Milano - ITALY
Tel. +39 02 2399-3660
Fax. +39 02 2399-3411
E-mail: zanero@elet.polimi.it
Web: www.elet.polimi.it/upload/zanero
--------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world
attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------
------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
