Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-IDS
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: newbie quetsions

Subject: Re: newbie quetsions
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:45:58 +0100
Julius Detritus wrote:


They are outdated. The most recent exploit tested must be two years old...
They are copy and paste from IDS tests which are far older.





[...]

Do you really care about the phf exploit? Or maybe the old sshutupteo from
gobbles? Are you talking about organizations or museums?




[,,,]

So your exploit database must be very old



This raises the question: when testing IDSs - are the exploits used important ? Do you have to use the latest ? Are the results invalidated by old exploits ?
Back when I tested IDSs myself (that's now 4 years ago...), I didn't think it was very important - I made sure, though, that I had various "classes" of attacks (directory-traversal, shellcode/buffer-overflow).


Reproducability is a big problem, too. NSS probably wants test from Q1/04 to be comparable with test from Q1/05, at least to some degree. So I'd say it is - under this objective - mandatory to change as little factors as possible - and that surely includes the exploits and evasion-techniques (though they seem to vary nonetheless).

People flaming NSS should also keep in mind that testing IDSs today is really a battle of materials. Back in late 2000 (when I did the work for my thesis), I could use our training-lab with a dozen (well equipped) PCs and some hubs to get a good picture of the capabilities of half a dozen products.
Today, you need a big lab with switches, taps, packet-generators, big servers - and you still can't simulate what it will look like in the real-world with dozens of sensors and remote-locations - costs are probably skyrocketing anyway.


I don't think NSS's test are the Holy Grail - but it cannot be disputed that they have at least a methodically correct approach and re-test old and new products continuously.


If anybody can do better - please stand up now ;-)



cheers,
Rainer

--
===================================================
~     Rainer Duffner - rainer@ultra-secure.de     ~
~           Freising - Munich - Germany           ~
~    Unix - Linux - BSD - OpenSource - Security   ~
~  http://www.ultra-secure.de/~rainer/pubkey.pgp  ~
===================================================


-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>