Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Focus-IDS
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...

Subject: Re: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:22:35 -0500
The problem I am having is that some packets (usually summary events),
in the response tab, there is no option to view the data, but in the
configured response tab, "Capture 256 bytes of applicable data" has a
green check. Also, when I edit a policy to turn on extended logging,
let's say 10 packets for an alert, I cannot view that packet data,
even though in the other tab, it says it is logging it. For the
packets that will display data, it's great, and I love how it
integrates with Ethereal.

Chris


On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:54:36 -0000 (GMT), Chris Brown <chris@get-tuf.com> wrote:
I have been trialling Intrushield and it logs and displays packet info
just fine, have you installed Ethereal and pointed Intrushield to it's
location?  Also Intrushield tells you what sig it has fired on in the
alert viewer.......

Regards

Tuffer

"I could soar like an Eagle but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines"


We have intrushield deployed here, and I am disappointed. The ability
to create user-defined signatures is very poor. There is no way to
make a signature to look at all ports and protocols, so with a UDS,
you must specify a protocol for it to look at. There is no
command-line access to write signatures, so you must use their Java
GUI. There is no way to import sigs from other vendors, such as snort,
and the rule flexibilty is just not there. The built-in signatures is
a closed-set, so you do not know what IntruShield's signatures are
firing on. You also cannot filter out traffic. There are filters
available, but they only work on signature based detection. Anomaly
detection will still fire on the filtered traffic. I have yet to get
the logging capability to work. You can set it to log X packets, but
it won't display them when you view alerts.

Hope this helps,
Chris

On 18 Dec 2004 01:49:19 -0000, Jacob Winston <jctx09_at_yahoo.com> wrote:


I have been evaluating Intrushield and ISS but am still unsure on which
route to take. Does anyone have compelling info on why Intrushield is
better or vice-versa? Any help is appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from 
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>