Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Newbie question: autoblocking with IDS/IPS |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:40:41 -0800 |
Inline... Gary -----Original Message----- From: Mike Johnson [mailto:mike@enoch.org] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 2:00 PM To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Newbie question: autoblocking with IDS/IPS Daniel wrote:
I'm thinking of buying one of that new CISCO IDS boxes which can be placed inline in the future.
MJ> Do you mean the 4240? If so, we just received a couple of them and
intend to put them through their paces in our lab.
The following Cisco sensors can be run in inline mode with IPS 5.0 software:
- 4215
- 4235
- 4240
- 4250
- 4255
- 4250-XL
- IDSM-2
The 4240 and 4255 are the newest sensors, and have just recently started
shipping. The main difference between these and the other models is they do
not have hard drives or CDROM drives. Instead, they utilize flash cards and
can be upgraded or reimaged from the network rather than the CD.
Is anybody of you using the automatic shunning (I guess it's called so) feature of the CISCO IDS? Does this make sense? (Which signatures should be autoblocked?)
MJ> We were told that the version of the software that handles blocking is not yet shipping. If anyone knows any different, do tell. We haven't quite figured out our policy on what gets blocked and what doesn't, but we'll take it on a signature by signature basis. The IPS 5.0 release will be shipping in the next couple months, and allows inline operation. Shunning is an older feature that many customers used in earlier releases. It will continue to be supported if you wish, but several drop actions will likely be more popular.
Or are you just monitoring and then blocking manually?
MJ> We're not 100% convinced we'll put them in blocking mode at this point. Ideally, it would be automagic, but false positives lead to blocking legitimate traffic by accident. Traffic normalization and antivirus signatures might change your mind on this. Even when installed in inline mode, though, you can select which signatures take automatic blocking actions of any type. Gary -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: CISCOs new IPS, Barnes Brandon A1C AFWA/SCHS |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Local Mirror Prevention with IDS, Dimitrios Patsos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Newbie question: autoblocking with IDS/IPS, Mike Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | CISCOs new IPS, Christoph Pertl (tm011081) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |