Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: TippingPoint Releases Open Source Code for FirstIntrusionPrev ention Test Tool, Tomahawk |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 6 Nov 2004 13:16:02 -0800 |
(thread is getting long, so just going to snip the whole thing, hopefully you kept a local copy) Hey Greg/Marty, I don't think anyone would argue that tcpreplay or tomahawk are written for performance testing of IDS or IPS. I'm sure some people do that, but both have rather limited use in that regards (you want to generate background traffic using *your* network's traffic). What tcpreplay and tomahawk do rather well is provide the means to safely reproduce malicious traffic for testing detection capabilities. Unlike "live tests", tcpreplay/tomahawk don't require people to distribute working exploit code or attack an actual host which due to the nature of exploits will likely have to be "fixed" in some manner. Unlike exploit code, there is no risk that a pcap will also re-format your harddrive or require you to install and configure a wide variety of operating systems and applications to attack. Of course, unlike a "live test" there is some trust involved that the pcap contains packets which are relevant for the test you are running. Wether or not this precludes using either tool for being used by someone evaluating an IDS/IPS probably depends on how much they trust the pcaps. For those people who don't want to trust pcaps and don't have the means to get a library of working exploits, I'm sure Blade will be more then happy to sell you IDS Informer (of course, now you have to trust Blade, so you're just shifting your trust). Of course if you already have a repository of valid pcaps (maybe something the OSVDB guys could do?) with known attacks, then using these tools probably make a lot of sense for certain kinds of tests. Aaron, the tcpreplay guy -- http://synfin.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Snort signature packet generator, Graeme Connell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TippingPoint Releases Open Source Code for FirstIntrusionPrev ention Test Tool, Tomahawk, Martin Roesch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TippingPoint Releases Open Source Code for FirstIntrusionPrev ention Test Tool, Tomahawk, Greg Shipley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TippingPoint Releases Open Source Code for FirstIntrusionPrev ention Test Tool, Tomahawk, Martin Roesch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |