Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Stateful Anomaly Detection Molding |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:24:42 -0400 |
What can the Blackhats of the world due to perpetuate rule set molding
of Stateful Anomaly Detection engines to allow malicious traffic through
without being detected? How reliable are S.A.D. engines in detecting
unwanted traffic?
A few thoughts:
- IDS engines --- which are very well understood --- still tend to
be astonishingly weak against directed, surgical attacks (attacks
in which an explicit goal is made of avoiding a particular detector). Just recently on this list, Dave Maynor from ISS cited a flaw in a
competing IPS product that would have been a major discovery
in 1998, when Newsham, Paxson, Meltzer, Dug Song, and I were all
just beginning to do research on signature IDS. Despite the fact that virtually every IDS/IPS engine deployed today
has exploitable weaknesses, IPS evasion is still not a tool in most
attackers toolboxes. Have any operators on this list ever detected
an attacker abetted by Fragroute? Fragroute gets press mentions
and is freely downloadable! "Anomaly detection" is so new, and so un-proven, and so hyped
and marketed, that I doubt anyone is giving serious thought to how to
evade it. - Despite all this, Arbor Networks actually has done research into
anomaly detection evasion, and we have designed and built
mechanisms to resist training attacks --- suggesting to me that there
are plenty of "anomaly detection" engines out there that can be faked
out. - However, I would suspect that a far more fruitful avenue of attacking
anomaly detection systems is to chaff them into generating millions
of false positives. On enterprise networks, most well-known anomaly
detection techniques are noisier and harder to tune than signature
systems. - With regards to IPS vendors, by the way, you will be surprised at how
simple the mechanisms are that underly vendor claims to "anomaly
detection".--- Thomas H. Ptacek // Product Manager, Arbor Networks (734) 327-0000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fortinet IDS, Mark Teicher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fortinet IDS, Ian Gallagher |
| Previous by Thread: | Stateful Anomaly Detection Molding, Beauford, Jason |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stateful Anomaly Detection Molding, Drew Simonis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |