Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Wishlist for IPS Products |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:37:26 -0400 |
And what about blocking fragmented packets entirely. I would argue that this would be an acceptable config on many networks. Jack On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:30:30 -0400, Tony Carter <tcarter@entrusion.com> wrote:
David, Can you back your claim that IPS can easily be evaded by fragging packets? Have you actually tested this or is it your guess? -Tony On Sep 12, 2004, at 12:29 AM, David Maynor wrote:Yeah....I am gonna go ahead and disagree with you on some of these.I have seen a lot of discussion about the differences between IDS, IPS, and firewalls and the potential for convergence, but I do not recall a discussion on the primary features that an IPS should have out of the box. I am thinking of: - Flow Control - limitations on flooding, unused connections, etc...Most of this should be handled by the signature base.- Robust, ACURATE signature baseOnly way to do this and not create tons of false postives is true protocol parsing. This knocks out most IPS vendors like Tipping Point.- Packet capture - no debate on how much before, as that has been covered - Pre-deployment network analysis tools to accelerate deployment - Anomaly detectionWhy? I have yet to see a system that is more than a parlor trick. Anomaly based system are even easier to evade than sig based systems that don't do protocol parsing. What I would add is better tools for testing. Almost nobody grabs a copy of Canvas from Immunity or Impact from Core and actually checks what attacks are caught. Further more an even fewer number use modded copies of public exploits to see if the claims made by vendors are actually true. How many vendor's IPS implementation would actual catch a MS03-026 exploit if you frag at the RPC layer at a size like 8 bytes? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more. --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What is false alarm rate and false positive rate?, Zhuowei Li |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: IPS, alternative solutions, Murtland, Jerry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Wishlist for IPS Products, Tony Carter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Wishlist for IPS Products, David Maynor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |