Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Top Layer Attack Mitigator - Experience? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:01:17 -0400 |
Hi, We've been using TL 2800 platform for about 6 months and recently switched to their new 5500 platform. Our experience has been quite good regarding the hardware and also we feel we are working with guys who really have experience in DDoS. That's the best part of TL; They have very knowledgeable security engineers with real experience on high traffic attacks and they just make sure the IPS fits well on your infrastructure. Hardware side, let me tell you this: we went through really dificult times with huge attacks. As most companies it took us completely unprepared. Our PIX 535 behaved like a small hub during the attacks, completely unoperational and unable to sustain the SYNs/sec traffic. So we went shopping and of course went to the big names first. We initially deployed a NetScreen 5200 and after a couple of attacks it became useless as well. At that point our ISP suggested TL. We were not sure at the beginning since the company can be considered small if compared with Cisco and NS, but TL offered us a trial. This just worked well. They even tested the IPS deployment with IXIA traffic generators and proved to us that the 2800 (it is a cluster of 8 IPS) sustained attacks of 550-600,000 SYNs/sec. We haven't had very large attacks since then (only small attacks of about 60,000 SYNS/sec), but after the equipment being working flawlessly for the las 6 months we are pretty confident we are in good hands. The only thing I could mentioned for the 2800 was the management interface. It seemed clumsy to me at times but the new platform (5500) has made excellent improvements on this side. They also lack a very comprehensive MIB but the enhancements to the alarms triggering mechanism (you can now generate syslog messages that alert when SYNs/sec are above a threshold level), are steps on the right direction. This guys seemed to work hard improving their IPS offer, they have made the architecture more modular and even added a Firewall module which should help network engineers to enforce security policies and save some CPU cycles on the IPS unit. Overall I see the TL guys in a very confortable position on the IPS market and if their support continues to be as good, they'll just doing the right stuff. James.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: McAfee Intercept, David Maynor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: need your help,thanks, Charles Heselton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Top Layer Attack Mitigator - Experience?, Zul-Azry Alias |
| Next by Thread: | Switch Port Mirroring, Andy Cuff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |