Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Layer 3 and Firewall |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:51:48 -0400 |
VLANs aren't the most secure way to separate segments because of VLAN hopping attacks. On the Cisco you could make it a little more secure by implementing port-security but this can be a pain to manage if you have a lot of devices connected. Have you considered installing the firewall services module in the the 6500? This basically gives you virtual pix firewalls instead of using standard access-lists to control access between the VLANs.Hi,
Is it a REALLY BAD idea to have multiple Firewall segments connected on the same 6509?
I have a 6509 Layer 3 switch which connects the LAN , WAN and Server segment. This has three Layer 3 VLANs
I plan to implement a Firewall [ either PIX or checkpoint] which will segregate these 3 segments.
On the Cisco 6509 I will convert the existing Layer 3 VLANs into Layer 2 and assign those IP[which is the default gateway for the respective segments] to the 3 interfaces of the Firewall.
Firewall is managed by me[Infosec dept] while the switch is managed by Networking dept.
My worry is - After i implement Firewall , if the network admin pulls out the Firewall cables and brings back the Layer 3 VLANs with those IPs then there is no Firewall.
How can we tackle this risk ?
What is the technical workaround. Is it a REALLY BAD idea to have multiple Firewall segments connected on the same 6509?
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Layer 3 and Firewall, jorgen . sorqvist |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Layer 3 and Firewall, econtreras |
| Previous by Thread: | R: Layer 3 and Firewall, Massimo Baschieri |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Layer 3 and Firewall, jorgen . sorqvist |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |