Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Can phase 2 proxy-id be modified on SonicWall VPN's? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:38:45 -0500 |
All, I've ran into a roadblock that I've never come across before on a VPN between a Netscreen and a SonicWall. I have 2 different protected networks behind the Netscreen that the SonicWall net needs access to across the tunnel. Here are the facts.. -The network behind the SonicWall needs access to two different networks behind the Netscreen -Netscreen VPN is designed with route based topology -Both protected networks behind the Netscreen are connected to different trunked interfaces on the Netscreen -I am using a single tunnel interface on the Netscreen, therefore NHTB is required Since phase 2 proxy id on the SonicWall is determined by the "access rules" that control traffic across the tunnel, we initially get a proxy-id mismatch. I can modify the Netscreen to match the proxy-id that the SonicWall is sending, but since the SonicWall needs access to two different networks behind the Netscreen, it will try to negotiate a separate phase 2 SA for access to the second network behind the Netscreen. Because I am using a route based topology on the Netscreen, in theory I would only need to build one phase 2 SA to the Sonicwall. Since the SonicWall essentially has two phase 2 SA's and the Netscreen only has 1, only the SA with the corresponding proxy-id will negotiate properly and therefore the SonicWall can only communicate with that network. I then added a second phase 2 SA on the Netscreen and bound that to the appropriate phase 1 gateway. That worked for when we initiate traffic from the SonicWall side, however, when we initiate traffic from the second network behind the Netscreen, the packets get lost because the tunnel.1 NHTB entry for the remote peer is bound to the VPN that has the proxy-id configured for the first network. I guess I'm not looking for suggestions on what I can try on the Netscreen side to fix the issue as I have a couple of ideas. My bigger question is whether or not it is possible to manipulate the proxy-id on the SonicWall? As stated earlier, it seems that the phase 2 proxy-id on the SonicWall is determined by the rules that dictate access control. We've run across similar situations numerous times with SonicWall as well as other Non-Netscreen vendors, and it seems that if there were a way to manipulate the proxy-id (for example, configure the proxy-id as the public peer IP addresses of both sides, instead of the protected networks on both sides), I think a lot proxy-id mismatch headaches will go away. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PIX 6.2(2) behaviour for traffic from lower to higher level, Amol Sapkal |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | PIX 6.2(2) behaviour for traffic from lower to higher level, Amol Sapkal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |