Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | FW: Stale IKE SA on FW-1 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:51:37 +0200 |
Hi List, has anyone ever had an IKE SA that just wouldn't die on a Checkpoint? The Firewall in question is a (fairly new) R61 clustered on Nokia hardware. Normally the #vpn tu command should allow SA's to be deleted either singly or collectively. I have a stale IKE SA between this gateway and another (externally managed) gateway that refuses to die. The SA is more than twice as old as the reneg time, and is just sitting there blocking negotiation of a new one. If I delete it with #vpn tu absolutely nothing changes and the SA is still showing in the list. Have any of you ever seen this before? Does anyone have an idea what I can do? I have already tried: - making changes in encryption in the community settings and publishing the policy - deleting the object for the remote gateway and the related rules, publishing and then recreating them - every possible #vpn tu command, including deleting ALL IKE+IPSec SA's - banging my head on the wall I was even considering booting the firewall, but the SA should be synched on both so I assume that will be pretty useless as the other node will have the SA as well. Thanks in advance for any suggestions, I wasn't able to find *anything* on google about this type of problem. Chris Meidinger
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPSec tunnel between OpenBSD and Pix 515E, Miguel José Hernández y López |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Stale IKE SA on FW-1, ??????? ?? ??? |
| Previous by Thread: | IPSec tunnel between OpenBSD and Pix 515E, Ajitabh Pandey |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Stale IKE SA on FW-1, ??????? ?? ??? |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |