Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Should FW have DNS name?

Bill Smith wrote:
> What I meant was, does it not make it easier for the hacker?
> If fqdn is not assign, it takes the hacker longer to hack.
>
> Bill
>
> */ted creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.com>/* wrote:
>
>     My firewall has a dns name + dhcp address. Works fine. There is a
>     shell script that Linux runs when the dhcp address changes.
>      
>     tedc
>      
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* fwbuilder-discussion-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
>     [mailto:fwbuilder-discussion-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] *On
>     Behalf Of *Bill Smith
>     *Sent:* Friday, June 09, 2006 3:43 AM
>     *To:* Firewall@SecuriryFocus;
>     fwbuilder-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>     *Subject:* [Fwbuilder-discussion] Should FW have DNS name?
>      
>     Hi Folks,
>
>     Should FW has DNS name?
>     If it does, what is the implication?
>
>     Plz comment.
>
>     Bill
Having an A record pointing a name to your firewalls IP address is not 
going to help any hacker do anything except perhaps remember where your 
firewall is on the internet, especially if you have a dynamic IP 
address. Its not going to give anyone any elevated priveledge through 
your firewall into your network, or directly /to/ you firewall. Just 
dont give it a name that has any relation to versions or types of 
firewall software that you are running. firewall.company.com would do no 
harm....

regards,

Greg