Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:03:47 -0400 |
What you put works great when using PSK as the authentication for your VPN, and it works with the software clients assuming the OU they belong to is called "mygroup". But when you run that config with a PIX 501, it doesn't pickup the split tunnel. That's basically what I have on the head end, but the ACLs for the split tunnel don't get pushed. I attempted to do a ca subject-name <ca_nickname> OU=<my_ou_here> without luck, attempting to set the OU to the same as the vpngroup name Conlan Adams ________________________________ From: Aaron Rohyans [mailto:aaronr@imcu.com] Sent: Fri 6/9/2006 1:01 PM To: Conlan Adams; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question I may be misunderstanding you, but why do you have to use names within your certs to activate your split tunnel? Why can't you define the group and create a split tunnel ACL within it on both ends to serve as the basis for split-tunneling? access-list nonat permit ip <local ip><local sub> <remote ip><remote sub> isakmp policy 5 authentication rsa isakmp policy 5 encryption 3des isakmp policy 5 hash sha isakmp policy 5 group 2 isakmp policy 5 lifetime 86400 vpngroup mygroup address-pool myaddresspool vpngroup mygroup dns-server X.X.X.X vpngroup mygroup wins-server X.X.X.X vpngroup mygroup split-tunnel nonat vpngroup mygroup idle-time 1800 vpngroup mygroup password ******** Or are you using an EasyVPN client/server setup? Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: Conlan Adams <mailto:conlan@midwesteyebanks.org> To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:12 AM Subject: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Stupid question that I am having a heck of a time finding an answer for when I search the web. I have a remote access setup, where I have a PIX 515E inhouse, and several 501s outhouse. All of them have validated certs, but I am having issues with my split-tunnel implementation. After much digging, I seem to have found that the split tunnel isn't propagating the ACLs because the vpngroup isn't being set properly on the 501s. They are connecting, and authenticating properly, and all traffic is sent over, but since the split-tunnel has to be assigned by name, its not carrying over. The PIXs are connecting fine, and passing traffic, just not running the split-tunnel. Any thoughts on how I set the vpngroup on the 501s? I attempted to set an OU with the ca subject-name command, but doesn't seem to help. Thanks in advance Conlan Adams ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Should FW have DNS name?, ted creedon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question, Brandon Harris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question, Aaron Rohyans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question, Aaron Rohyans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |