Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Firewall Dissertation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:39:09 -0800 (PST) |
Sir, With todays semi-intelligent firewalls many of them already have the capability of defending themselves. Many of the Threat Management Platforms on the market have a basic built in IPS/IDS and if a trigger event is noted the system will then either black hole the traffic or shunt it. This capability is not just limited to firewalls, load balancers such as the Radware series have the capability of dumping or redirecting traffic in the case of a traffic signature or DDS perceived threat. I have an external load balancer that redirects any traffic that matches a defense signature to a "honeypot" As an example, both our load balancers and firewalls will look at packets for ones generated by NMAP and dump the packets. If a Nessus scan is used the firewall automatically black holes the IP address and sends an alert to our administrators cel phones because these "tappings on the door" are somtetimes a prelude to something else. There are even services such as those offered by Symantec in which they monitor an onsite ManHunt server, if it alerts on traffic it will send the alert to the Symantec SOC, then modify the organizations firewalls, usually within seconds of an attack. The SOC will then review to make sure the ManHunt made the appropriate decision. If it is found to have done so the "security chain of personnel" at the company is then notified by Symantec of the attack. It is my opinion, only, that any good security administrator will not let the unit run and make decisions on its own because there could be the possibility that the traffic is in fact legitimate and therefore causes issues to the company. I Nessus and NMAP within our network and our internal firewalls can and do drop my legitimate scans if I forget to modify them of the scan. TCP
"coder" <elite.coder@ntlworld.com> 01/19 3:59 AM >>>
Hello everyone,
Some of you may remember my earlier email, I said that I was going to do my
dissertation on a client-side firewall system that can be configured from a
centrally located web interface. Unfortunately most of you responded with
the fact that many companies have already written such a system.
So I have had to think of another project and unfortunately again, my
dissertation supervisor wont let me change top, so I have to think of other
issues with firewalls.
Anyways, I did a search on limitations of current firewall technologies, and
one site said a common misconception is that you run a firewall and that's
it, it takes care of itself. We admins know this, firewall rules have to be
added and modified all the time to deal with new threats and policies. But
it did get me thinking that maybe someone could write a firewall that is
semi-self managed.
So, my idea is, to write a client-side firewall system that can be
configured through a centrally located web interface (which has already been
done) but! interface the firewalls with an IPS/IDS system such as snort...
Snort stores alerts into a database, so, I could just write the firewalls to
look at the database and block off IPs and Ports which are shown in the
alerts. Does such a product already exist? I realise Snort and other IDS
systems give off false positives, that isn't too much of a biggie I could
deal with that in the following way:
The rules generated from the snort database will have some kind of marker,
so that admins know they were generated by snort.
If an admin takes off a firewall rule because it was a false-positive, then
the firewall will know next time it sees that alert that it was a
false-positive.
I'm also thinking that it will help admins find false-positives too... if a
user complains that he cant do something (something that is within company
policies) then you know that one of the alerts generated was a
false-positive and the IDS can be tuned.
Anyways, if you guys called tell me what you think and if there are any
firewall products out there that use IDS/IPS systems to generate rules.
Thank You
~Davie Elliott
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new
and used cars.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Firewall Dissertation, CraigPaterson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Firewall Dissertation, Derick Anderson |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Firewall Dissertation, CraigPaterson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Firewall Dissertation, Derick Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |