Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Blocking mass mailings caused by viruses |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:36:50 -0500 |
I know in my network I just redid the local DNS entry for the outbound SMTP so they LAPTOP user don't have to change there settings when there in my network and force them to use my SMTP servers. This way I could block 100% of all workstation from every sending out a email on there own without going thru my SMTP servers. I know this not the best way of doing things but it worked and solved a lot of head aches for me. I of course have my SMTP servers using none modify DNS so there is no problems with message delivery. Doug Block Chief Information Officer of Efast Funding 713-983-4055 (Direct) 888-338-3863 x 4055 (Toll Free) 713-983-4555 (Direct Fax) 832-483-4495 (Cell) _____ From: Rod Barnhart [mailto:rod.barnhart@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:41 AM To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Blocking mass mailings caused by viruses POP uses port 110, not 25. It's not clear from your message whether you provide SMTP services to everyone and they just POP their messages, or if you allow them to connect to any SMTP server that they need. If the first case, you can still block port 25 from all but your SMTP servers. If the second, I'd recommend implementing the first case, if possible. That said, many desktop AV programs can alert you if there are XXX number of outgoing messages per minute (or maybe it was per second?) so I'm sure there's an enterprise solution that does the same. Rod Barnhart On 10/12/05, Erdahl, Larry E <Larry.Erdahl@allina.com> wrote: Over the past month we've been blacklisted by Spamhaus several times because of infected workstations and laptops (contractors and consultants) sending out mass mailings. My management doesn't want to block port 25 because we have a handful of physicians who are using POP mail. Does anyone know of an IDS, IPS, firewall, router ACLs, etc... that will block outgoing SMTP traffic, based on abnormal traffic volume? Thanks in advance! Larry E. Erdahl IS Security Specialist Allina Hospital & Clinics Office (612)775-1273 Cell (612)804-7324 larry.erdahl@allina.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: PIX 525 No NATconfiguration, Jan Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: CISCO V7.0(2) stable ?, Casey DeBerry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Blocking mass mailings caused by viruses, Rod Barnhart |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Blocking mass mailings caused by viruses, Derick Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |