Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Firewall / Router redundecey |
|---|---|
| Date: | 20 Jul 2005 18:33:20 -0000 |
Greeting all, this post is more a networking/ redundancy question but here it goes anyway. I have many remotes sites. Each site has 2 high speed connections available (ex. 17.16.12.1 and 172.16.12.2). Each site also has a layer 3 switch (primary IP gateway of 172.16.12.2) capable of link aggregation and VRRP. The catch is the redundant connection is via a Cisco 3950 (IP of 172.16.X.1). I have no access to this device. It is part of a large province wide supernet project and I can't make config changes to the device. This takes out the possibility of VRRP or Link aggregation. Right now for redundancy I can buy an addition service that will give me OSPF on the 172.16.X.1 device and of course add OSPF to the 172.16.x.2 interface and simply wait for convergence to give me the path to our central office 172.16.128.1, which in turn has balanced T3 connections to the internet. This however is a huge cost increase and I can't believe that there isn?t a cheap and easy fix to give reliable redundancy and or load balancing. Right now I am looking at WAN balancing hardware de vices or a Linux box with 3 NICs, one acting as the gateway. Does anyone have any good ideas how to manage the redundancy for this? I feel like I am missing an easy fix here. Thanks
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Minimal secure iptables firewall, Harry Bobbaers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Minimal secure iptables firewall, Carlos Costa |
| Previous by Thread: | SSL Web Proxy is a Double Edged Sword, Greg Jones |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Firewall / Router redundecey, Stong, Ian C. (Contractor) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |