Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | SSL Web Proxy is a Double Edged Sword |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:29:01 -0400 |
Greetings, I was thinking about this the other day and would like to hear any thoughts you may have. Many businesses have a strict egress network/firewall configuration where the only allowed traffic is HTTP 80 and HTTPS 443 via a web proxy. What concerns me is the proxying of SSL. Many think this is super duper secure, saying "Since SSL encrypts, it must be good!" But if what you are trying to do is limit outbound connections from your employees, this is basically a wide open hole. Here's how: - For the client (from work): Get the stunnel source from stunnel.org and apply the patch for SSL web proxying. Compile. This works on Unix, Linux, and Windows too. - For the server (home box): Configure stunnel to listen on port 443 since many proxies only allow this port for SSL. At first I was going to tunnel the connection to telnet, but if you tunnel it to SSH then you have the benefit of using SSH tunneling (which even Putty can do) so that you don't have to reconfigure your stunnel server every time you want to connect to something new. So, it's a bit redundant having SSH over SSL, but it's worth it. Is there a way to prevent arbitrary data going over your SSL web proxy? Here are some ideas: - Use various group policy and host-based security packages that restrict which executables are allowed to run, with a default policy of deny. Also, some kind of network-level authentication should probably be implemented in a way that would not allow the user to bypass the exe security by simply reformatting their machine or using a live cd. - Or maybe better, after the SSL session key exchange takes place, the browser could make a second connection via SSL to the proxy server,and transmit the session key allowing the proxy to see inside the SSL connection and verify that it is indeed HTTP and not arbitrary data. Comments? Thanks Gregory Jones
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: CISCO PIX 501, Binh P Hoang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Minimal secure iptables firewall, Harry Bobbaers |
| Previous by Thread: | Netscreen Question, dattatray narayan vaidya |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SSL Web Proxy is a Double Edged Sword, primero |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |