Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: RE: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:56:24 +0800 |
I've been doing so many POCs with NetScreen VPNs and I haven't had any pain interoperating them, especially with Cisco, Linksys and even checkpoint. You're experience with NetScreen might have been with old ScreenOS versions. I can also say what you've said if I'm quite adept to checkpoint firewall. -----Original Message----- From: tj-evans@blueyonder.co.uk [mailto:tj-evans@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 8:24 PM To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: RE: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen Watch out for IPSec VPN compatability issues with NetScreen, they are a pain to make interoperate with other firewall vendors. Also watch out for broken debug and session info facilities on the 2000 and 5000 series NetScreens. Once a session has been pushed to the ASIC you can't get any info about that session any more, including debug. I'd suggest you have a look at the Crossbeam C and X series platforms, i've used them a lot and they are very, very good. X series is great if you want firewalling and IDS/IPS.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Theoretical question: Can firewall detect attack which he can’t block?, cygnuz1979 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen, Alan Byrne |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen, Markus Wernig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Netscreen-50 High Availability setup, Dave Killion |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |