Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Open Source vs Proprietary |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:47:34 +0300 |
Hello, I live and work in Greece, where most IT people have never reallyused any *nix system. To these people, compiling packages, patchingthe kernel and things like tarballs are the deavil's doings. In myexperience, it is important for a company or an organization to have acompany to support their infrastructure, whether that company iscalled Cisco, Check Point or Juniper etc, especially if they do nothave people with the necessary expertise. Ease of use is also important. Hardware appliances obviously are inno need of the X or Y dependency package. Also, software solutionsthat provide everything in a single CD (Check Point even offers theOS) are in general much less of a husle to install. Having a uniformsolution that takes care of issues such as configuration (of multipledevices in many occasions), log viewing, reporting etc is importanttoo. To summarize, commercial solutions promise to offer easy of use,added features (that actually work) and a sense of security, meaningthat someone will help the customer when trouble comes (hopefullysuccesfully). Hope I helped,Haris On 6/9/05, Joseph (Joe) Lynn <Joe.Lynn@tiniusolsen.co.uk> wrote:> > > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry everyone, forgive my ignorance, but I'm still a bit confused on these> issues – I don't understand why anyone would buy a firewall that has a cost> associated with it rather than just taking a bog standard pc and installing> an open source firewall on it, such as IPCop or OpenBSD PF. > > > > From the responses to my post about IPCop and the messages about OpenBSD, it> looks like these options are as secure as you're going to get. > > > > Perhaps it might be easier to configure proprietary firewalls, and they> might give better logging and analysis options, but presumably, certainly> with IPCop, and I would assume, with OpenBSD, you can find adequate Open> Source options that will provide any of the functions that the other> firewalls do (with the exception of ISA2004, which sounds like it works with> the applications rather than the packets….) – like e.g. snort. > > > > Do people just buy firewalls because they can't be bothered to learn to set> up Open Source systems, or is there more to this that I'm missing? > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Joe > > > >
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Open Source vs Proprietary, forums@kentane.net |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Watchguard!, Pablo Hauser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Open Source vs Proprietary, forums@kentane.net |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Open Source vs Proprietary, Jason Dixon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |