Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 26 May 2005 15:24:02 -0700 |
Check out this article on the Juniper IDP:
http://www.nwc.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=160910907#1
Juniper came out on top.
On May 25, 2005, at 6:45 PM, Chen, Jovi wrote:
Hi,
I work with these two firewall about 6 years and here below is my suggestion. I wish it can help you to make decision.
1st, CP has smartdefense and can update the signatures if you buy the
license.
NS built in some IDP function but can't update the signature before
you upgrade the ScreenOS.
2nd, CP provide a very very good management console and you can control
it without trouble.
NS just provide the web GUI and hard to manage.
3rd, CP has perfect cluster architecture and it's a real load balance
function.
NS just provide HA function. It's NSRP just a combination of two HA
not a real load balance.
By the way , my experience of these two firewall in past 6 years is , you just busy about 2 or 3 months if you buy CP but you need troubleshooting all the time before you replace it , if you but NS.
Jovi Chen
-----Original Message----- From: Rossen S. Naydenov [mailto:rnaydenov@postbank.bg] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:41 PM To: firewalls Subject: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen
Hi,
I have gone down to two choices: Checkpoint or Juniper Netscreen Firewalls Both solutions meet our technical requirements.
I would like to here from people who are using these devices. How are
they integrated in IDP network scheme? I know that Juniper offers their
own IDP module.
In terms of manageability which one is better? How about scalability?
Thanks in advance ;) -- Rossen S. Naydenov rnaydenov@postbank.bg
Disclaimer:
This communication is confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication by mistake, please notify us immediately by
responding to this email and then delete it from your system.
Bulgarian Post Bank is not responsible for, nor endorses, any opinion,
recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any
information contained in this communication.
Bulgarian Post Bank cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or
completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public
network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or
amended, please call the sender.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ISA 2004 - professional opinion, Kevin Lee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen, Bryan Bain |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen, Chen, Jovi |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Checkpoint vs. Juniper Netscreen, Ha, Jason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |