Fw: ISA 2004 - professional opinion

----- Original Message ----- 
From: NeO 
To: dan.tesch@comcast.net 
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: ISA 2004 - professional opinion


I am new to ISA 2004 world, I used Wingate for a long period. and due to 
Wingate instability we finnaly made the decision to move to Microsoft ISA 2004.

I've got impressed when I first saw ISA, the implemenation of rules in ISA is 
far more supperior than Wingate. ISA is somewhat similar to Kerio WinRoute 
Firewall. But I favor ISA over Kerio for stability & performance.

Actually, I started to like it much more.

I have found only one issue, since my branch office has only one Server with 
Windows 2003 + ISA with no Active Directory nor DNS Server, I had to 
reconfigure all PCs in branch office to use ISP DNS instead of ISA as primary 
DNS.

I would be very happy if someone can explain this to me.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Tesch 
  To: 'secdata' 
  Cc: firewalls@securityfocus.com 
  Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:53 PM
  Subject: RE: ISA 2004 - professional opinion


  It is pretty usable, it passes my Nessus scans pretty well... download the 
trial!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: secdata [mailto:secdata@gmail.com] 
  Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:38 PM
  To: firewalls@securityfocus.com
  Subject: ISA 2004 - professional opinion


  Hi Guys,

   

  I was wondering if someone had an experience with ISA 2004 Firewall? If so . 
what is your professional opinion about this product as a read / professional / 
secured / useable firewall ?

   

   

  Thank