Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Software vs hardware firewalls ... |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 08 May 2005 12:04:38 +0200 |
El sÃb, 07-05-2005 a las 19:31 +0000, netnut6@comcast.net escribiÃ:
Hello, I was wondering how a software based firewall(mcafee, Norton etc) can help protect your machine if the operating system(Windows XP) is vulnerable? Also how is a software based firewall any better then hardware. The way I see it if you have a software based firewall and the operating system has security issues I doubt very much a software firewall will protect that machine.whereas if it's a hardware based firewall and the operating system has vulnerabilities the chances of it being attacked are slim since they would have to first find some vulnerability with the hardware firewall then go after the operating system(firewall default settings with all ports closed). Obviously if a port is open and that application has a vulnerability then it would get attacked. Please let me know if I'm on the right track here.
I think they are totally different things. Software based windows firewalls like Mcafee, Norton or Sygate Personal Firewall just control wich applications can make connections to the Internet. Hardware based firewall control the connections made and the traffic between the connections. They allow you to do many more tricks to control the traffic than the software firewalls. My personal choice is having both. A good hardware (or something like Checkpoint or a good Linux/FreeBSD firewall) as a perimeter firewall and then a software firewall on each machine, just to block earlier the Spyware or Malware that always gets into the Windows machines.
Thank you..
Regards. -- Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez Director Tecnico de bgSEC jkerouac@bgsec.com bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas http://www.bgsec.com ESPAÃA The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow Roman candles. -- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Which one to choose: Checkpoint,Cisco,Juniper Netscreen, Chris J. Cooper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Software vs hardware firewalls ..., Ha, Jason |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Software vs hardware firewalls ..., David L Rice |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Software vs hardware firewalls ..., J Weiss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |