Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Firewalls
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Which one to choose: Checkpoint,Cisco,Juniper Netscreen

Subject: RE: Which one to choose: Checkpoint,Cisco,Juniper Netscreen
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 03:11:20 -0700
The new Astaro appliances are also very nice for lower volume per unit
scenarios, and have a vast array of anti-spam, anti-spyware, IDS/IPS
(inline snort), and reporting features.  And they are cheap.  We were
going to go with Netscreen, but ended up going with the Astaro as it did
all the same stuff and more (and we needed certain security features as
opposed to pure performance).  The Astaro units have full routing, VPN,
authentication, NAT, high availability, etc.  They just don't make them
as big as the high end PIX/Netscreen/Checkpoint boxes.  Of course, you
can also buy the distro and throw it on your own gear, as a build your
own gateway kind of deal.

Otherwise, I definitely second the Netscreens.  Especially for higher
volumes.

Chris J. Cooper

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Antrim [mailto:chuck@antrim.org] 
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 9:11 AM
To: Guillome Main
Cc: firewalls@securityfocus.comfirewalls@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Which one to choose: Checkpoint,Cisco,Juniper Netscreen

I recommend the Juniper Netscreen.

The Netscreen does all that you require below.

If
On May 6, 2005, at 2:49 AM, Guillome Main wrote:

 Hi All,

I would like to ask some advice from you. I need to buy a firewall/vpn

appliance for my business.
Here is what we have now:
Two hosted servers at ISP location.
These two servers need at least 50-10 site-to-site vpn connection to 
other parties remote locations and remote user vpn access as well.
The maximum daily traffic is 100Mb at the moment, but will increase in

the future.

Which manufacturer would you choose?
I checked out:
Cisco Pix 15
Checkpoint Firewall-1
Juniper Netscreen 25-50

Here are the requirements:

Firewall/VPN appliance requirements

Firewall:
-    Protocol anomaly detection
-    Deep inspection/application level: http, ftp, smtp, pop, dns, stb
-    NAT / PAT

VPN:
-    Concurrent Branch Office Site-to-Site VPN tunnels: min 10
-    Mobile user VPN tunnels: up to 50
-    Tunnel interfaces: min 10
-    Encryption: DES, 3DES, AES
-    Authentication algorithms: MD5, SHA1
-    Authentication type: Preshared Key, IKE, PKI(X.509), L2TP/IPSEC,
PPTP, CHAP, MSCHAP, MSCHAPv2, and PAP
-    Perfect forward secrecy (PFS): DH Group 1,2,5
-    IPSEC NAT-T
-    IPSEC in Transport Mode not only in Tunnel Mode (net-to-net,
host-to-net, host-to-host)
-    VPN User connection with VPN clients

Firewall and VPN User authentication:
-    built in database: up to 100 users
-    3rd party authentication: RADIUS, RSA SecureID, LDAP
-    Authentication method: web based, client based (3rd party VPN  
client
or MS Windows built-in)

High Availability (optional):
-    network load balance capability or
-    active-passive cluster capability (fail-over)

IP Address Assignment:
-    Static
-    DHCP

System management:
-    WebUI
-    Console
-    SSH
-    Real-time monitoring
-    Historical reporting
-    Alarm, event notification

Administration:
-    configuration roll-back
-    applying minor access or configuration changes without restarting
the device




WSAPP:
Ez a level virusellenorzesen esett at!
This message was checked against viruses!





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>