Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Most secure small home office firewall under $700 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:54 -0500 |
Can someone let me know what company makes the most secure and strong small office firewall. Sonicwall looks good for about $500 but I know there are others. It would be even better if the interface was easier to use. I presently have a Sonicwall in one office and it works great but I am not sure about how secure they are. I need strong securtity to protect a machine that is running IIS. IIS is running a service for my business. I need to secure the system from attack.
Everybody is jumping in this thread shouting out their favorite firewall, which is fine I guess, but it doesn't really address the question properly. While we're shouting out favorites, m0n0wall (http://m0n0.ch/wall/) is as good as anything if it has all the features you require (most likely does). Open source, based on a stripped down FreeBSD installation. But that's beside the point. My point is all the firewalls everybody is talking about are layer 3-4, which isn't going to get you any more protection for your IIS box than your Sonicwall. You still have to open TCP port 80 and/or 443 inbound to the IIS box, which is more than enough to compromise it. The only thing these firewalls know is that traffic is destined for port 80 or 443, so per its ruleset it's "safe" to pass. Doesn't matter if it does contain the latest IIS exploit within the packet. You can't really say which firewall is "most secure". It depends on how it's configured. Protecting IIS itself isn't typically the job of a firewall, since you're letting that traffic through. The firewall is protecting other services on that server from being exposed to the internet, but that's not enough. On whatever firewall you use, only open the minimum required inbound ports to the server. Implement egress filtering, to the extent of blocking all outbound traffic from the IIS server if possible (opening up when necessary for Windows Updates and the like). Not foolproof by any means, but another layer of protection is always good. Another option you can consider is one of many available reverse proxies, or firewalls that perform so-called "deep packet inspection", not assuming that all traffic destined to TCP 80/443 is ok to pass. Typically you're going to go over your $700 budget on something along those lines, and it's probably overkill for your situation. The most important thing to protect IIS is to follow best practices for securing IIS. Google for 'securing IIS' and you'll come up with a bunch of resources, from Microsoft and elsewhere. Lock down IIS and keep your patches up to date, and maintain as strong a firewall configuration as possible, and you'll be in far better shape than most. Regards, -Chris -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FREE Download - The Future in Desktop Firewalls is Available Now NEW NetOp Desktop Firewall, the world's first driver-centric firewall software - protecting your laptops and corporate PCs at ring-zero! NetOp features sophisticated process & application control, centralized management and multiple network user profiles - NetOp is able to increase security when mobile users plug back into your network. Step into a more secure future - Try it FREE http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CrossTec_firewalls_050315 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Re: OpenBSD PF problems., F Walls |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: PIX vs its competitors, Kritsada . L |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Most secure small home office firewall under $700, Mike Etheridge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Most secure small home office firewall under $700, Cory Stoker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |