If this isn't the best place to post this I apologize.
Been looking for some help on getting this scenario to work.
Imagine a network with 4 offices.
A, B, C, and D. A and B are connected by a T1, B and C are also
connected via t1. These t1's are controlled by Cisco 2600's. A, B, and
C all have a fully meshed PTP VPNs setup. D is hanging off PTP VPN
connections to C and A, for different traffic.
A is also accepting easy VPN connections for remote users, who need to
talk to all offices.
To do all of this, I had to setup static routes on the A Pix to the WAN
routes to the other networks.
In doing so, I appear to have broken the routability (new word?) to the
PTP VPN connections to those other offices.
I had plans of setting up a GRE tunnel between the 2600's over the VPN
and using EIGRP to weight routes, to carry over incase we lost a t1, but
I cant get the tunnels to work, from A with those static routes
declared.
If I remove those static routes, I break the remote users, as well as
some traffic for D.
Is there any way I can do this, without adding an additional PIX to the
mix?
Thanks in advance
Conlan Adams
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE Download - The Future in Desktop Firewalls is Available Now
NEW NetOp Desktop Firewall, the world's first driver-centric
firewall software - protecting your laptops and corporate PCs at
ring-zero! NetOp features sophisticated process & application
control, centralized management and multiple network user profiles -
NetOp is able to increase security when mobile users plug back
into your network. Step into a more secure future - Try it FREE
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CrossTec_firewalls_050315
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
