Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: firewall suggestion |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:14:09 -0500 |
Actually that is not correct. Cisco does not use ASIC. They use Intel. Check the datasheets on Cisco's website. However, the Netscreen 5gt does not use the ASIC either. It is an Intel chip. This was for the AV feature. While I fan of Netscreen, I must confess that I am not a huge fan yet of the 5gt. The IDP is only a token one at best. The AV is unimpressive from my experience. They had a lot of trouble at first with updating pattern files due to their update server not being able to handle all the requests. However, it is not a bad deal for a small office that doesn't need a lot. VPN implementation is cake with them. I don't have much experience with the PIX. So I can't sit here and tell you it is crap. In fact, I am sure it isn't. It doesn't sound like like your company is wanting to spend a lot of money. The 5gt, is still a decent little firewall. It could probably do all you would really need there. However, I would go with the XT over it. ________________________________ From: Lamy Vincent [mailto:VLamy@groupama-am.fr] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:38 AM To: charles antrim; tom.farrar@it-ps.com; chuck.ITPS@it-ps.com; kevin@retail-tech.com; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: firewall suggestion Sorry but PIX is an ASIC based appliance too...... it's not a pc..... Vincent Lamy Consultant Réseau & Sécurité Service des Moyens Informatiques Groupama Asset Management Tél : +33 (0) 1 44 56 58 57 ________________________________ De : charles antrim [mailto:chuck@securityfocus.com] Envoyé : samedi 19 février 2005 03:00 À : tom.farrar@it-ps.com; chuck.ITPS@it-ps.com; kevin@retail-tech.com; firewalls@securityfocus.com Objet : Re: firewall suggestion You speak with no authority my friend. Head to head the Netscreen out performs any pc system. The pix is a pc, the Netscreen is an ASIC based appliance. That alone is a differentiator. On 2/17/05 1:17 AM, "tom.farrar@it-ps.com" <tom.farrar@it-ps.com> wrote: The PIX 515 is far superior to netscreen's, full stop(.) - by concurrent connections or VPN tunnel, or even throughput. I would love to see some field reports for the netscreen 25 in comparison to the 515. The downside to the PIX product is the management interface.. Tom Farrar Data Centre Engineer tom.farrar@it-ps.com IT Professional Services ________________________________ From: charles antrim [mailto:chuck] Sent: 17 February 2005 02:03 To: Tom Farrar; 'Kevin Russell'; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: firewall suggestion The Juniper Netscreen 25 is a fare better choice than any pix product. The netscreen blows away the pix on any head to head features and functionality. On 2/16/05 6:07 AM, "Tom Farrar" <tom_farrar@msn.com> wrote: Depending on how much flexibility you demand from the firewall a good choice is a PIX 515. Also a suggestion is to collate your FTP and webserve into one, preferably a linux box - with the box you gain from the migration you could build another linux box and stick squid and snort on that. Another thing is to take into consideration what switch you are using, a Catalyst 2950 would be a good buy for you internal lan. Regards, Tom Farrar Data Centre Engineer tom.farrar@it-ps.com IT Professional Services ________________________________ From: Kevin Russell [mailto:kevin@retail-tech.com] <mailto:kevin@retail-tech.com%5d> <mailto:kevin@retail-tech.com%5d> Sent: 15 February 2005 14:36 To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: firewall suggestion hi list this is my first posting, I am in the position to take over as network admin, mostly just for the security of the machines/network... any ways we have an older firewall appliance its a hotbrick, then a router and a switch 24 port, for the network mostly just a windows machines, a 2k3 server std, for the domain controller, and two DMZ machines 1 is a web server and the other is a Linux ftp server, and we were thinking of putting another 2k pro box up in the DMZ as a second web server, Im trying to get them to let me put an IDS sys into the mix, but to no avail, I need a some ideas on what you think would be the better setup for this network, ( its a small only about 15 clients in the office) thx alot for the help I know its a noob question.... thx
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: authenticating admins in DMZ, Danilov, Jaroslav |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: firewall suggestion, Javier Otero De Alba |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: firewall suggestion, Vlad Slavoaca |
| Next by Thread: | Re: firewall suggestion, Chris Buechler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |