Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: PIX ROUTE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:11:17 +0000 |
I would suggest option2. The PIX firewall is not ideal for routing
between internal subnets all reachable from a single interface. By
selecting the internal router as a gateway for your clients you also
maintain more internal routing flexibility. You can create a default
route on the internal router pointing to the PIX eth1 interface and if
required tell the router to advertise this default route throughout your
internal routing domain.
HTH
Stuart
Hesperia DOS-IT Security <itsecurity@hoteles-hesperia.es>
16/02/2005 11:23
To: firewalls@securityfocus.com
cc:
Subject: PIX ROUTE
Hi, I am about to make a big change in my network. I will describe the
scenario both scenarios. I have a Cisco PIX 515 connected to a switch
(using
eth1). The same switch is connected to a router. The router connects me to
WAN, where I have some servers and users. The PIX connects me to Internet
using eth0. The hosts (users computers) have the pix IP (eth1) as the
gateway, because most of the traffic is www. Is it possible to static
route
WAN connections (coming from eth1), using the same interface (eth1) [see
option1.jpg] ? Is it better to connect the router to the pix (eth2) and
put
as a gateway the router [see option1.jpg]? Thanks.
Eduardo Di Monte
option1.jpg
Description: JPEG image
option2.jpg
Description: JPEG image
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: PIX ROUTE, Fetch, Brandon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: firewall suggestion, tom . farrar |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: PIX ROUTE, Fetch, Brandon |
| Next by Thread: | NAT vs PMTUd, Dan Lynch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |