Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: PIX ROUTE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:24:17 -0600 |
Had this very same problem for a temp office we setup while they built-out their perm space. Had the PIX as the gateway and needed to install a WAN link from another router - wouldn't 'route' even with the appropriate "route inside x.x.x.x" command on the PIX. Your best scenario to resolve this is to change the router's ethernet IP address to what the PIX currently is, then change the PIX to another address.
From there, on the router you define a gateway of last resort as the PIX's
IP address. This will forward traffic that isn't destined for networks behind the router to the PIX - if you have your routing configured properly that is. Doing it this way also removes any need to reconfigure any static IP/DHCP things on your local network. The reason why it has to be done this way is the PIX cannot perform redirects. Even if you have routing set to redirect traffic it won't. Something about the PIX not allowing traffic to enter and leave from the same interface. A security measure I'm sure not limited to just the PIX. Either way, using a router as a router and a firewall as a firewall has always been good in my book. The PIX has never routed very well in my experience. Hope that helps, Brandon -----Original Message----- From: Hesperia DOS-IT Security [mailto:itsecurity@hoteles-hesperia.es] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:24 AM To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: PIX ROUTE Hi, I am about to make a big change in my network. I will describe the scenario both scenarios. I have a Cisco PIX 515 connected to a switch (using eth1). The same switch is connected to a router. The router connects me to WAN, where I have some servers and users. The PIX connects me to Internet using eth0. The hosts (users computers) have the pix IP (eth1) as the gateway, because most of the traffic is www. Is it possible to static route WAN connections (coming from eth1), using the same interface (eth1) [see option1.jpg] ? Is it better to connect the router to the pix (eth2) and put as a gateway the router [see option1.jpg]? Thanks. Eduardo Di Monte This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, confidential and/or insider information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this message and any attachment(s) by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: firewall suggestion, charles antrim |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PIX ROUTE, Stuart SP Powney NONLILLY |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: PIX ROUTE, John Coke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PIX ROUTE, Stuart SP Powney NONLILLY |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |