Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:56:22 +1100 |
G'day Warren (And thanks to everyone else for their replies!), Thanks for the offer - I would have been interested - however Nokia came back with pricing that was very attractive - So we're no longer looking @ SPlat. With regards to monitoring the upstream router - basically we want to implement VRRP so that if either link fails, the firewall can fail-over to the either link. We're not looking to do load balancing of the traffic. Cheers, matt -----Original Message----- From: Warren Verbanec Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:53 AM To: 'Lowth, Matt'; 'firewalls@securityfocus.com' Subject: RE: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP? Hello, Check Point only does their ClusterXL protocols- no VRRP on SPLAT. No plans to, either. Resilience (the company I work for) does serious hardware High Availability, monitoring everything from the driver to the kernel to the app via an onboard PCI-X card. Not to sound too much like the Sales Engineer that I am... I think that we might be able to address your needs quite well. I'm curious, though- it seems that the distinction that you're making is that you want to monitor network state as well as application state- which only really means that you want to ensure that the upstream switch is able to pass traffic between the firewalls (this is all that VRRP really does)...do you want to monitor the upstream router as well? -Warren Verbanec Resilience Corporation West Coast Sales Engineer +1(650)996-1003 -----Original Message----- From: Lowth, Matt [mailto:LowthM@tabcorp.com.au] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 2:00 PM To: 'firewalls@securityfocus.com' Subject: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP? G'day, I was wondering if anyone knew whether or SPLAT supports VRRP, and if not, is there any planned support? I'm asking because I'm looking to implement a high availability WAN with redundant links & firewalls, however, to the best of my knowledge, ClusterXL only handles firewall redundancy. Is there any other products besides a Nokia appliance which will either support VRRP or an equivalent link redundancy protocol? FYI - In case anyone asks, I'm plugging straight into Ethernet, so there's no Cisco router to do HSRP either. Thanks In Advance, Cheers, Matt ************************************************************************ *********** The information in this e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The message and files may be protected by legal professional privilege, or other legal rules. The confidentiality of and privilege applying to this message and files is not waived if this message or files has been sent to you by mistake. If the reader of this message or files is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, distribution or copying of this message and files are strictly prohibited. If you receive this message or files in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete all copies from your computer system. It is the recipient's responsibility to check this message and files for viruses. Thank you. ************************************************************************ *********** ******************************************************* PLEASE NOTE: This internet email message has been checked for viruses and appropriate content to ensure it complies with TABCORP's electronic communication policy. ******************************************************* *********************************************************************************** The information in this e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The message and files may be protected by legal professional privilege, or other legal rules. The confidentiality of and privilege applying to this message and files is not waived if this message or files has been sent to you by mistake. If the reader of this message or files is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, distribution or copying of this message and files are strictly prohibited. If you receive this message or files in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete all copies from your computer system. It is the recipient's responsibility to check this message and files for viruses. Thank you. ***********************************************************************************
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | R: Cisco PIX 501 [info req], Sisone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: VPN tunneling between PIX & Checkpoint, Cunningham, Andy |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP?, Agarwal, Ankur |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Cisco PIX WatchGuard crash, Andrew Shore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |