Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:17:30 -0000 |
If you are looking for creating Link redundancy with Checkpoint Cluster, go for Rain Connect.It is an third party module which can be integrated with checkpoint very easily. ___________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Lowth, Matt [mailto:LowthM@tabcorp.com.au] Sent: 29 November 2004 03:30 To: 'firewalls@securityfocus.com' Subject: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP? G'day, I was wondering if anyone knew whether or SPLAT supports VRRP, and if not, is there any planned support? I'm asking because I'm looking to implement a high availability WAN with redundant links & firewalls, however, to the best of my knowledge, ClusterXL only handles firewall redundancy. Is there any other products besides a Nokia appliance which will either support VRRP or an equivalent link redundancy protocol? FYI - In case anyone asks, I'm plugging straight into Ethernet, so there's no Cisco router to do HSRP either. Thanks In Advance, Cheers, Matt **************************************************************************** ******* The information in this e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The message and files may be protected by legal professional privilege, or other legal rules. The confidentiality of and privilege applying to this message and files is not waived if this message or files has been sent to you by mistake. If the reader of this message or files is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, distribution or copying of this message and files are strictly prohibited. If you receive this message or files in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete all copies from your computer system. It is the recipient's responsibility to check this message and files for viruses. Thank you. **************************************************************************** ******* ************************************************************************************* The message is intended for the named addressee only and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone else, nor may it be copied in any way. The contents of this message and its attachments are confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the named addressee and/or have received this message in error, please advise us by e-mailing security@colt.net and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. Internet communications are not secure and COLT does not accept responsibility for this message, its contents nor responsibility for any viruses. No contracts can be created or varied on behalf of COLT Telecommunications, its subsidiaries or affiliates ("COLT") and any other party by email Communications unless expressly agreed in writing with such other party. Please note that incoming emails will be automatically scanned to eliminate potential viruses and unsolicited promotional emails. For more information refer to www.colt.net or contact us on +44(0)20 7390 3900.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: PIX PPTP - Nat bypass?, Bunting, Bob |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP?, Harald Nesland |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP?, Warren Verbanec |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Checkpoint High Availability & VRRP?, Lowth, Matt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |