Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Pix 515's fail to failover |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:02:23 -0600 |
Yes we have snmp traps going to an NMS, we're not getting anything from the pair, its not even logging normal traffic to buffer when the problem exists. Its very strange and we're somewhat stumped on where to start troubleshooting since this is a live customer and of course downtime is not an option. We've got a small maintainence window on Monday so I'll toss it at Cisco and see if it sticks. Please feel free to suggest any troubleshooting steps. Whats your opinion on crossovers for lan based failover? I had considered that as a possible problem since i had issues with it years ago, though as I said we have hundreds of pairs in the same configuration so I think i'm reaching here. On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:49:43 +1000, Ivan Coric <ivan.coric@workcoverqld.com.au> wrote:
sounds strange - are you sending snmp-traps from the PIX? does that give you any info?Spigga <spigga@gmail.com> 15/11/2004 9:47:09 am >>>Thats the odd part, these pairs were failing fine in the past, we test often, and we have about 250 more pairs that are fine. Since I sent this email one pair has decided to play nice, no config changes. We brought the primary up to do some troubleshooting and the problem was gone. One pair is still having the same issue. We're going to spend some time with the failed pair on Monday. I guess we'll see what happens. On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:35:19 +1000, Ivan Coric <ivan.coric@workcoverqld.com.au> wrote:verify your failover config -http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v50/config/advanced.htmuse the command show failover - this will show you the status of the failover cheers Ivan Ivan Coric, CISSP, RHCE IT Technical Security Officer Information Technology WorkCover Queensland Ph: (07) 30066414 Fax: (07) 30066424 Email: ivan.coric@workcoverqld.com.auSpigga <spigga@gmail.com> 12/11/2004 8:56:21 am >>>I have 2 HA pairs that refuse to failover properly. If the primaryisactive, and I try to fail it over to standby, they both go standbyandtraffic halts. I have to power cycle the primary and all is well. This is the same situation on two separate pairs one pair running 6.3(3) and one running 6.3(4). They both started doing this on the same day. One during failover testing and one pair just stopped passing traffic and never failed over so we had a guy power off the primary and since then failover does not work. In one case we replaced the primary and it still happens. We have replaced serial and lan failover cables. Anyone seen or heard of this? We havecloseto 300 pixes, a large number runninf 6.3(3) and some running 6.3(4) and no others are having trouble but we haven't failed any oversincethis started. I'm afraid to test.***************************************************************************Messages included in this e-mail and any of its attachments arethoseof the author unless specifically stated to represent WorkCoverQueensland. The contents of this message are to be used for the intended purpose only and are to be kept confidential at all times.This message may contain privileged information directed only to theintended addressee/s. Accidental receipt of this information should be deleted promptly and the sender notified.This e-mail has been scanned by Sophos for known viruses. However, no warranty nor liability is implied in this respect.************************************************************************************************************************************************* Messages included in this e-mail and any of its attachments are those of the author unless specifically stated to represent WorkCover Queensland. The contents of this message are to be used for the intended purpose only and are to be kept confidential at all times. This message may contain privileged information directed only to the intended addressee/s. Accidental receipt of this information should be deleted promptly and the sender notified. This e-mail has been scanned by Sophos for known viruses. However, no warranty nor liability is implied in this respect. **********************************************************************
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Router config question, JGrimshaw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Router config question, pramod |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Pix 515's fail to failover, Spigga |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pix 515's fail to failover, Zachary Spalding |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |