I work for a Juniper/netscreen distributor as you can see in the signature, be
carefull in my opinion.
SA is the market lider (more tha 40% total market), CORE (the standard
module)support web, vt100, file sharing (win and nix), Secure Application
Manager is for client/server apllications like SAP, outlook, lotus, terminal
access, propietary,..., Network Connect is VPN under SSL, Secure Meeting is
under SSL and supports remote control.
The autentication is very flexible, ldap, active directory, RSA and others.
The administration is role based.
The release 4.1.1 Is stable, easy adminitration, flexible, is rack designed
(some noise and heavy), you must limit the phisical access.
The $$ is similar to others, Juniper is big company, stable (see the last two
years).
Test and obtain your own resoults, I am shure that is the best in the market.
Ing. Fco. Javier Otero De Alba
Diplomado en Seguridad Informática ITESM CEM
ITStrap
Product Manager
Juniper Secure Access SSL
5243-4782 al 84 Ext.300
México, D.F.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Beauford, Jason [mailto:jbeauford@EightInOnePet.com]
Enviado el: Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 08:21 a.m.
Para: firewalls@securityfocus.com
Asunto: SSL-VPN Opinion - Slightly OT
Looking into SSL-VPN technology. Currently looking at the
Netscreen/Juniper models.
I'd like to get the forums opinion on these devices, specifically from
the above mentioned vendor. Have you encountered any problems or
limitations? If so, like what? How easy was the implementation? What
kind of feedback did you receive from your end users as a result of the
implementation.
I want to know what I should look out for if I were to implement such a
solution, and one specifically from the Netscreen/Juniper camp.
Thanks in advance.
JMB
