Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Browser redirect to proxy |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:38:45 +0200 |
It's remarkable what the try to get a patent on. Cisco has been doing this in the PIX for years... /Alex -----Original Message----- From: David M. Zendzian [mailto:dmz@dmzs.com] Sent: den 21 oktober 2004 17:50 To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: Browser redirect to proxy Hello all, I have done some programming on the nocat captive gateway (nocat.net) and have noticed reciently that someone (acacia) appears to think they have a patent on redirecting a browser to a proxy that forces authentication. I believe that there should be plenty of examples of pre 1999 of a firewall redirection of services to a proxy as well as authentication through proxy or back end auth web server to allow browser access to a 'global network'. As the patent calls it. I am not one of those absolute zelots against patents, but I am against taking either common knowledge or common sense and trying to turn that into a licensing scheme to make money. Btw the patent # is 6226667 and it was filed in january 1999. Also, acacia doesn't have an application or library, or even a full algorithm they are licensing. Only the idea was patented and anyone else who happened to build it indepently are they want to charge license fees to. In fact they don't seem to be targeting the hardware or software manufacturere, but the end isp who is deploying the tech. I thank you for any facts you can help me unearth. David /--------------------------------------\ David M. Zendzian * dmz@dmzs.com (415) 867-7812 - phone ------------- Imagination is greater than knowledge * Albert Einstein Every day is a good day, whether you like it or not! *
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Cisco CBAC, Dan Tesch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VPN problem for FW-1 Checkpoint, Randall Paige |
| Previous by Thread: | Browser redirect to proxy, David M. Zendzian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Browser redirect to proxy, David M. Zendzian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |